2010
DOI: 10.2166/wp.2010.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reform of water institutions: review of evidences and international experiences

Abstract: This paper provides an overview of the reform of water institutions in developing countries in the last three decades focusing on the 'what, why and how' of institutional reform, and outlines their implications for policy and research. The review covers four areas: (1) water rights and river hasin institutions; (2) decentralized irrigation management; (3) private sector participation in urban water supply; and (4) regulation of water infrastructure. The review suggests that (a) the theoretical rationale for re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been previous review studies on the impact of PSP in infrastructure sectors such as Harris (2003), Marin (2009), Araral (2010, Haanyika (2006), Williams and Ghanadan (2006), Jamasb et al (2004), Wamukonya (2003), Bacon and Besant-Jones (2001), Lobina (2005), Kirkpatrick, Parker, and Zhang (2006) and Bayliss (2003). A major difference of this study as compared to the previous studies is the use of systematic methods to identify the studies for inclusion in the review.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been previous review studies on the impact of PSP in infrastructure sectors such as Harris (2003), Marin (2009), Araral (2010, Haanyika (2006), Williams and Ghanadan (2006), Jamasb et al (2004), Wamukonya (2003), Bacon and Besant-Jones (2001), Lobina (2005), Kirkpatrick, Parker, and Zhang (2006) and Bayliss (2003). A major difference of this study as compared to the previous studies is the use of systematic methods to identify the studies for inclusion in the review.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1998, the water and sanitation system of the entire province (approximately 150,000 km 2 ) was given by the provincial government in concession to only one private company (Saltiel, 2003). During this private period, the company consistently failed to provide services to the poorest areas of the city, as also reported for other Argentinean provinces or for other countries where water services had been privatized (Azpiazu et al, 2005;Hall & Lobina, 2006;Castro, 2007;Araral, 2010). In part due to these problems, but also responding to local political changes, the provincial government rescinded the contract in 2009 and the service reverted to a state-owned company (CoSAySa).…”
Section: Description Of the Case Study And Water-conservation Initiatmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The government held in reserve the right to reprivatize the new company [64]. Low investments and failure to provide services to the poorest areas of the city were a constant during both the public and private periods, as was also reported in other parts of the country and the world [65,66].…”
Section: System Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%