2003
DOI: 10.1110/ps.0393503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refolding out of guanidine hydrochloride is an effective approach for high‐throughput structural studies of small proteins

Abstract: Low in vivo solubility of recombinant proteins expressed in Escherichia coli can seriously hinder the purification of structural samples for large-scale proteomic NMR and X-ray crystallography studies. Previous results from our laboratory have shown that up to one half of all bacterial and archaeal proteins are insoluble when overexpressed in E. coli. Although a number of strategies may be used to increase in vivo protein solubility, there are no generally applicable methods, and the expression of each insolub… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other general observations of the data reveal that the denaturing method is more effective at purifying AbpSH3-ArkA while the native method appears to be better for AbpSH3. Some of these observations are consistent with other studies that show different proteins have different preferences towards the chosen buffer system [10]. Most striking however is that our new QIAcube method is able to purify equivalent amounts of protein to the corresponding manual based gravity methods and that this method is able to purify orders of magnitude more protein compared to the previous QIAcube spin column method.…”
Section: Notessupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other general observations of the data reveal that the denaturing method is more effective at purifying AbpSH3-ArkA while the native method appears to be better for AbpSH3. Some of these observations are consistent with other studies that show different proteins have different preferences towards the chosen buffer system [10]. Most striking however is that our new QIAcube method is able to purify equivalent amounts of protein to the corresponding manual based gravity methods and that this method is able to purify orders of magnitude more protein compared to the previous QIAcube spin column method.…”
Section: Notessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This method can easily be adapted to other types of purifications that use other affinity, hydrophobic or ion exchange resins and should prove to be a versatile method for obtaining sufficient protein for subsequent biochemical analyses. In this study we decided to use this method for both native and denaturing Ni-NTA purifications as different proteins have different preferences for this common affinity resin [10]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protein was cloned into pet15B (which has a thrombin cleavage site) and expressed and purified as previously described (Maxwell et al 2003). Folding/unfolding rates were determined under the conditions described (Table 1) by laser T‐jump fluorescence spectroscopy (Qiu et al 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several pieces of evidence suggest that this is not the case. Firstly, a similar refolding protocol has been used by others [35,36] and for ourselves (JLN, JB, AC, unpublished results) to refold several proteins (which also accumulate as IBs), and the refolded proteins were biologically active. Second, there are several evidences in the literature where the unfolded predictors predict a folded conformation (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%