2018
DOI: 10.1109/tci.2018.2855436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refocusing and Motion Parameter Estimation for Ground Moving Targets Based on Improved Axis Rotation-Time Reversal Transform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many excellent clutter suppression methods, such as displaced phase centre antenna (DPCA) [34] and space‐time adaptive processing (STAP) [35] can be used to suppress the strong clutter and increase the SCNR effectively, thereby improving the performance of the proposed method in the strong clutter background. The effectiveness of the DPCA and STAP in the moving target focusing and motion parameter estimation applications has been verified in many previous studies [9, 16, 18, 19]. However, for extremely non‐homogeneous scenarios, the performance of DPCA and STAP methods and CFAR technique may be obviously degraded, thereby deteriorating the performance of the proposed method in the low‐SCNR condition.…”
Section: Proposed Methods Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many excellent clutter suppression methods, such as displaced phase centre antenna (DPCA) [34] and space‐time adaptive processing (STAP) [35] can be used to suppress the strong clutter and increase the SCNR effectively, thereby improving the performance of the proposed method in the strong clutter background. The effectiveness of the DPCA and STAP in the moving target focusing and motion parameter estimation applications has been verified in many previous studies [9, 16, 18, 19]. However, for extremely non‐homogeneous scenarios, the performance of DPCA and STAP methods and CFAR technique may be obviously degraded, thereby deteriorating the performance of the proposed method in the low‐SCNR condition.…”
Section: Proposed Methods Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…In addition, the moving target azimuth spectrum may span over two or several pulse repetition frequency (PRF) bands due to the effects of DSE and DCS. In these cases, target spectrum split occurs, resulting in Doppler spectrum ambiguity [9,10]. These factors lead to difficulty in imaging and motion parameter estimation of moving targets, especially weak targets with a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that there is LRCM brought by the azimuth position. In order to correct the LRCM, the one-step keystone transform is adopted, which is shown below [26,27]:…”
Section: Imaging Processing For the Moving Targetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…W. A. Kuperman et al [20,21] verified the focusing ability of TR in real acoustic environments with ocean experiments. More recently, there is a growing research on TR in several applications domains, such as detection [22,23], communication [24,25], localization [26,27], or imaging [28]. For ranging system, time reversal methods can be divided into three categories, i.e., active time reversal (ATR) [29], passive time reversal (PTR) [30], and active virtual time reversal (AVTR) [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%