Reflexivity 2003
DOI: 10.1002/9780470776094.ch10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflexivity, ‘Bias’ and the in‐Depth Interview: Developing Shared Meanings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Part of this process involves all researchers utilized a reflexive process to enhance the trustworthiness of the analysis throughout analytical engagement (Morrow, 2005;Tracy, 2010). This involved reading the team's interpretations, meeting to discuss points of convergence and divergence, debate for and against codes as they were built into themes, and refining and retaining those which were analytically defensible to the group (Nicolson, 2003;Paulus et al, 2010).…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part of this process involves all researchers utilized a reflexive process to enhance the trustworthiness of the analysis throughout analytical engagement (Morrow, 2005;Tracy, 2010). This involved reading the team's interpretations, meeting to discuss points of convergence and divergence, debate for and against codes as they were built into themes, and refining and retaining those which were analytically defensible to the group (Nicolson, 2003;Paulus et al, 2010).…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, how people make sense of their illnesses and come thus to view their ‘impaired’ or failing bodies in ways that enable some form of emotional and social resolution including acceptance and adaptation (Charmaz, 1995). This involves studying the place of illness in the daily lives of individual patients across the life‐span and cultures to identify and understand the processes of coping, adaptation and the impact of illness on self, identity and life ‘narratives’ (Murray, 1999; Radley, 1999).…”
Section: The Psychosocial Context Of Chronic Illnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following an individualistic and researcher-centered tenet, reflexivity requires researchers to examine their intellectual assumptions, subject locations, and beliefs or emotions in relation to the researched. Doing reflexivity while adhering to a researcher-centered tradition calls for researchers to proactively turn the investigative lens away from others and toward themselves (Gluck & Patai, 1991;Nicoloson & Gough, 2003;Oakley, 1981;Reinharz & Conrad, 1988;Riessman, 1987). Incorporating reflexivity into teaching entails specific pedagogical designs that make students conscious of the lenses they wear as they carry out their observations and write their field notes (Hellawell, 2006;Tan & Ko, 2004), engage in in-depth interviews (Hsiung, 2008), and conduct data analysis (Stalp & Grant, 2001).…”
Section: Decolonizing Pedagogy In Qrmentioning
confidence: 99%