Reflexivity: a model for teaching and learning cultural responsiveness in mental health

Smith, Peter; Rice, Kylie; Schutte, Nicola S.; Usher, Kim

doi:10.1080/00050067.2022.2078648

Cited by 4 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The CRAM is underpinned by a literature review (P. Smith et al, 2021), a conceptual model (P. Smith et al, 2022) and qualitative interviews with Indigenous clients of mental health practitioners (P.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Item development commenced from the conceptual model of cultural responsiveness (P. Smith et al 2022), which is based on the literature review (P.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Smith et al, 2023a, 2023b), using both deductive and inductive methodologies (Morgado et al, 2017). This meant that items were initially deductively generated based on the following themes of cultural responsiveness (P. Smith et al, 2022): Awareness, Knowledge, Inclusive Relationships, Cultural Respect, Cultural Safety, Social Justice/Human Rights, Self-Reflection, Cultural Humility, and Cultural Competencies.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…CFA seeks to test whether the measures of a construct, in this case cultural responsiveness, are consistent with a priori understandings from literature and qualitative data of that construct (Awang, 2015). The measure in this study was derived from the theoretical model (P. Smith et al, 2022) developed from the published literature review (P.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The CRAM is based on a framework that emerged from a concept analysis of cultural responsiveness found within the literature (P. Smith et al, 2021) and was subsequently developed into a model of reflexivity for teaching and learning (P. Smith et al, 2022).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Development and validation of the Cultural Responsiveness Assessment Measure (CRAM): A self-reflection tool for mental health practitioners when working with First Nations people

Smith,

Rice,

Schutte

et al. 2023

Int J Soc Psychiatry

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The purpose of this study was to develop and to validate a measure of cultural responsiveness that would assist mental health practitioners across a range of disciplines, in Australia, to work with Indigenous clients. Aim: The Cultural Responsiveness Assessment Measure (CRAM) was developed to provide a tool for practitioners and students to evaluate their own culturally responsive practice and professional development. Method: Following expert review for face validity the psychometric properties of the measure were assessed quantitatively, from the responses of 400 mental health practitioners. Results: Confirmatory Factor Analysis yielded a nine factor, 36 item instrument that demonstrated strong convergent and discriminant validity as well as test-retest reliability. Conclusions: It is anticipated that the CRAM will have utility as both a learning tool and an assessment measure, for mental health practitioners to ensure that services are culturally responsive for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Item development commenced from the conceptual model of cultural responsiveness (P. Smith et al 2022), which is based on the literature review (P.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%