2003
DOI: 10.1177/00187267030568004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflexive Inquiry in Organizational Research: Questions and Possibilities

Abstract: Over the last 20 years, social science scholars have challenged conventional conceptions of social reality, knowledge, and the validity of our methods of inquiry. Many have criticized the aim of mainstream social science to provide an absolute, objective view of the world and have called for a reflexive stance in which we recognize all social activity, including research itself, as an ongoing endogenous accomplishment. Three main themes have emerged: a crisis of representation, an emphasis on the constitutive … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
456
0
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 451 publications
(465 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(43 reference statements)
2
456
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Innovation systems are complex and dynamic and scenario practice is applied more widely than our sample. Also, other analytical perspectives exist and may be equally valid (Cunliffe, 2003), see for instance Seidl & van Aaken (2009). Therefore, when using reflexivity in research or in scenario practice, it is also essential to make one's perspective clear so that the claims to knowledge can be constructively critiqued and improved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Innovation systems are complex and dynamic and scenario practice is applied more widely than our sample. Also, other analytical perspectives exist and may be equally valid (Cunliffe, 2003), see for instance Seidl & van Aaken (2009). Therefore, when using reflexivity in research or in scenario practice, it is also essential to make one's perspective clear so that the claims to knowledge can be constructively critiqued and improved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reflexivity as a methodology (Alvesson & Sköldberg, 2000), questions representation by suggesting that we are constantly constructing meaning and social realities as we interact with others and talk about our experience. We therefore cannot ignore the situated nature of that experience and the cultural, historical, and linguistic traditions that permeate our work (Cunliffe, 2003). This means that practice, such as scenario practice, is rooted in a particular moment and place.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a result of embracing the ideas of Mezirow's (2000, p. 22, cited by Papastamatis & Panitsides, 2014) 10-stage model, our critical reflections and reflexive dialogue (Pithouse-Morgan & van Laren, 2012), and our interactions with one another, we are able to commence on a journey that actualises our conceptions pertaining to the what, how, and why of a humanising pedagogy. Mezirow's perspective (2000, p. 22, cited by Papastamatis & Panitsides, 2014 enabled us not only to rethink and modify our existing understandings (Finlay, 2002), but it enabled us to confront and transform our existing thinking and possible biases (Mezirow, 1997) including so-called truths (Cunliffe, 2003) that can become beliefs. As such, our reflective writings have enabled us to construct a shared understanding of possible aspects that can be taken into consideration pertaining to the praxis of a humanising pedagogy by focusing on the what, how and why: what a humanising pedagogy is promoting; how it could be promoted, and; why it is important to promote it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%