“…As a result of embracing the ideas of Mezirow's (2000, p. 22, cited by Papastamatis & Panitsides, 2014) 10-stage model, our critical reflections and reflexive dialogue (Pithouse-Morgan & van Laren, 2012), and our interactions with one another, we are able to commence on a journey that actualises our conceptions pertaining to the what, how, and why of a humanising pedagogy. Mezirow's perspective (2000, p. 22, cited by Papastamatis & Panitsides, 2014 enabled us not only to rethink and modify our existing understandings (Finlay, 2002), but it enabled us to confront and transform our existing thinking and possible biases (Mezirow, 1997) including so-called truths (Cunliffe, 2003) that can become beliefs. As such, our reflective writings have enabled us to construct a shared understanding of possible aspects that can be taken into consideration pertaining to the praxis of a humanising pedagogy by focusing on the what, how and why: what a humanising pedagogy is promoting; how it could be promoted, and; why it is important to promote it.…”