Reflective writing: a tool to support continuous learning and improved effectiveness in implementation facilitators

Abstract

Background Implementation facilitators support the adoption of evidence-based practices and other improvement efforts in complex healthcare settings. Facilitators are trained to develop essential facilitation skills and facilitator effectiveness is typically evaluated post-implementation, but little is known about how facilitators apply and adapt didactic knowledge after training, or how learning and refining experiential knowledge occurs during the facilitation process. We propose the use of reflective writing as a tool to document and support facilitator learning and facilitator effectiveness. Methods Using an instrumental case study of the Coordination Toolkit and Coaching (CTAC) project, we explore the use of reflective writing by facilitators to support their learning and effectiveness. Six primary care clinics participated in weekly hour-long facilitation calls over a 12-month period to implement quality improvement projects related to care coordination. Two facilitators completed templated reflections after each facilitation call for their assigned sites, totaling 269 reflections. We used the declarative-procedural-reflective model, which defines the process of skill development in clinical practice, to qualitatively analyze the reflections. Two independent coders used content analysis principles to code text that captured facilitators’ observations, evaluations, interpretations, and communication. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze reflections by facilitator and by code within and across reflections. Results CTAC facilitators primarily used the reflections to summarize the calls (observation), assess the facilitation process and the tasks and activities they used (evaluation), document their thoughts about how to improve their own effectiveness (interpretation), and describe their communication with implementing teams. Ninety-one percent of reflections included observations, 42% interpretation, 41% evaluation, and 44% facilitator communication. In total, we coded 677 segments of text within reflections: 39% represented observation, 20% interpretation, 18% evaluation, and 23% facilitator communication. Conclusions The process of reflective writing allowed the CTAC facilitators the time and structure to evaluate their facilitation and to think critically about how to adjust their facilitation in response to their observations and interpretations. Reflective writing is a feasible and acceptable tool to support and document facilitator learning and effectiveness. Trial registration The project was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03063294) on February 24, 2017.

The development and implementation of a community engagement strategy to improve maternal health in southern Mozambique

“…In our study, this was supported by encouraging CE facilitators' reflection on the process and key issues that emerged in each CE session, which provided a space to record feedback from communities, helped to strengthen facilitators' engagement with activities and supported monitoring and evaluation of the program. Facilitator reflections has been used in quality improvement initiatives to promote buy-in and motivation as well as provide the time and structure to reflect on potential adaptations to improve engagement [20,21].…”

Facilitation in evidence implementation – experiences, challenges, and determinants of perceived effectiveness: a qualitative systematic review

“…One study (3%) was not clear on this aspect 32 . In the majority of studies (55%, 20/36), facilitators were appointed, assigned, or employed in that role, 13,14,22,23,25,26,30,31,33,36,39–42,44,45,47,49,50 while others (11%, 4/36) had facilitators who self-selected or expressed their interest in the role 20,38,48,52 . A small number of studies (11%, 4/36) examined whether a position (e.g., middle manager) had facilitator roles and functions, 21,28,29,35 a few had a mix of volunteers and appointed facilitators (6%, 2/36), 5,24 while the remainder (17%, 6/36) did not specify how this role was assumed 27,32,34,43,46,51 Table 1.…”

Can We Be at Peace With Unsolvable Suffering? A Qualitative Study Exploring the Effectiveness of Supportive Communication and Resilience Building

“…After the discussion, participants were asked to perform reflective journal writing based on their experiences and perceptions. Olmos-Ochoa et al 9 reported that reflective writing is said to encourage a writer to learn from an event, because it necessitates focused and analytical thinking.…”