Reflective and Agentive Functions of Narrative Writing: a Qualitative Study on the Narratives of University Students

Abstract

There is a lively debate in the literature on reflective processes and on the necessity to view them as consisting with differing levels of complexity. Within a semiotic and psychodynamic perspective, we present a conceptualization on reflective processes which distinguishes between reflection and reflectivity and articulates their relationship with narrative devices.The study analyzes 224 narratives of critical events written by 77 underachieving university students that took part in group training courses during the INSTALL European project.The corpus was subjected to a qualitative analysis of narrative function, with the aim of detecting narrative functions of reflection, reflectivity and agency, the latter being considered as an interconnected construct to the reflective process.The functions were discussed both on the basis of how the narrators reacted to the discontinuity in their self-image caused by the critical event, and based upon different types of narrative coherence (chronological, causal, thematic, autobiographical).The results highlighted that narratives with a reflection function, attribute the discontinuity generated by the event to the self, and show a causal coherence; those whose function is reflectivity interpret the discontinuity attributing it to the self in relation to others and present a thematic coherence; those of agency ascribe the discontinuity to a potential selves in action, and are characterized by an autobiographical coherence.The implications of the study will be discussed with reference to the value of narrative writing in promoting reflective-agentive processes.

Mirroring in Group Counseling: Analyzing Narrative Innovations

“…For example, an interesting perspective on reflectivity is the concept of mindfulness, namely, a mind-set of openness to novelty in which the individual actively constructs novel categories and distinctions (Langer, 2005). Recently, some of us (Esposito & Freda, 2015, 2016; Esposito, Freda, & De Luca Picione, 2016) proposed a semiotic and psychodynamic conceptualization of the reflective process which leaded and oriented some clinical interventions in different contexts (e.g., De Luca Picione, Dicé, & Freda, 2015; Freda, Gonzàlez-Monteagudo, & Esposito, 2016; Martino, Onorato, D’Oriano, & Freda, 2013). According to this conceptualization, the reflective process may be defined as a multidimensional and intersubjective product, conceived in terms of innovations in subjects’ meaning systems and as the ability to rethink to one’s own experience according to a new perspective (De Luca Picione & Freda, 2016; Freda & Esposito, 2017).…”

Possible use in psychology of threshold concept in order to study sensemaking processes

“…In the human being, the cultural and historical characteristics transform the organism–environment relationship in subject–world relationship, with more degrees of freedom but also a greater complexity (De Luca Picione, 2015; Esposito & Freda, 2015, 2016). This freedom realizes the possibility that the forms of interaction with the contexts are innumerable and potentially endless.…”

How Language Matters: Using Ethnographic Writing to Portray and Reflect on Languaging Actions

“…As a result, adolescents benefit from reflecting on how their languaging serves to enact certain kinds of relations with others (Norona et al, 2017). In one study, college students used their writing to reflect on how they used language for building supportive, trusting relations with peers or faculty (Esposito & Freda, 2016). In contrast, high school students in another study used their writing to portray how language serves to enact conflicts with peers (Flum & Lavi-Yudelevitch, 2002).…”