2009
DOI: 10.1080/16823200903234901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflections on trustworthiness in phenomenographic research: Recognising purpose, context and change in the process of research

Abstract: In interpretive research, trustworthiness has developed to become an important alternative

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…I felt that asking students to write the connections as they read the article would encourage immediacy of response and interrupt the students' reading as little as possible. Giving the same scripted instruction and model reading in each section, reduced the possibility of providing different cues to different subjects (Collier-Reed, Ingerman, and Berglund 2009;Ashworth and Lucas 2000). Using these written responses provided me with a large, focused data-set, gathered in a relatively short time, benefits that at least partially offset the loss of depth interviews might have produced (Ashworth and Lucas 2000).…”
Section: Research Approachmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…I felt that asking students to write the connections as they read the article would encourage immediacy of response and interrupt the students' reading as little as possible. Giving the same scripted instruction and model reading in each section, reduced the possibility of providing different cues to different subjects (Collier-Reed, Ingerman, and Berglund 2009;Ashworth and Lucas 2000). Using these written responses provided me with a large, focused data-set, gathered in a relatively short time, benefits that at least partially offset the loss of depth interviews might have produced (Ashworth and Lucas 2000).…”
Section: Research Approachmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In phenomenographic research, the dimensions of variation do not capture individual experiences but reflect the possible ways the participants have experienced a phenomenon at a collective level [Collier-Reed et al 2009]. In our study, the related dimensions of variation are grouped and given labels that capture the expressed understandings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is also to present the results and conclusions of a study to the research/professional community in an open way that enables the study as a whole to be scrutinised and critiqued. The primary purpose of doing so is to encourage and facilitate the research community recognising and judging for themselves the communicative credibility of the results in a holistic sense (Booth, 1992;Collier-Reed, Ingerman, & Berglund, 2009;Kvale, 1996). Furthermore, communicability also concerns the quality of the relationship between the original researcher and other researchers/professionals.…”
Section: Towards a Knowledge Claimmentioning
confidence: 99%