1851
DOI: 10.5962/bhl.title.55643
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflections on the phenomenon of rejuvenescence in nature, especially in the life and development of plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1940
1940
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Development, senescence, and sex are all pleiotropic effects of intra‐generational unidirectional epigenetic changes. We are reviving the notion of sex causing rejuvenescence (Braun, 1853 [1851]; Maupas, 1886; Geddes & Thomson, 1889; Maupas, 1889; Maupas 1890; Bell, 1988). Epigenetic resetting must occur after a finite number of successive mitotic divisions, otherwise individuals run up against the Hayflick limit (Hayflick & Moorhead, 1961).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Development, senescence, and sex are all pleiotropic effects of intra‐generational unidirectional epigenetic changes. We are reviving the notion of sex causing rejuvenescence (Braun, 1853 [1851]; Maupas, 1886; Geddes & Thomson, 1889; Maupas, 1889; Maupas 1890; Bell, 1988). Epigenetic resetting must occur after a finite number of successive mitotic divisions, otherwise individuals run up against the Hayflick limit (Hayflick & Moorhead, 1961).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion that sex induces rejuvenescence dates back to Bütschli (1876), and Maupas (1886; 1889; 1890), and possibly back to Braun (1853 [1851]), but was largely and erroneously discredited by Weismann (1889–1891; Lustig, 2000). Margulis & Sagan (1986b, 1988) followed Maupas with regards to rejuvenescence.…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The validity of the generalizations by Braun (1851) and by Hofmeister (1862) on the number of fronds produced per annum on the shoot of the mature plant, and the duration of the period from the first visible appearance of the frond to its emergence from the soil, have already been called in question (Watt, 1940). Further evidence on these matters and on departures from the 'normal' behaviour of bracken is provided by data from a plot on Lakenheath Warren, on a very acid podsolized sand (pH 3.6-4.0) (area E in Watt, 1940).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%