“…An outcome is that regional actors and overriding government policies are often discordant at the fundamental level of motivation. The setting and attainment of resource condition targets is sometimes viewed as the means to achieving the social "end" for a regional community (Wallington et al 2008). However, without a better understanding of the values of each group, how they relate to each other, and how these values are expressed in NRM, public policy in this domain may consistently fall short of expectations.…”
ABSTRACT. We report on a grounded theory research methodology to elicit the values that underpin community leaders' advice on regional natural resource management. In-depth, semi-structured in-person interviews of 56 community leaders permitted respondents to explore their values and to elucidate some trade-offs. Furthermore, analysis of the coded transcripts provides evidence of the anthropocentric nature of values, and the importance of people, communities, and physical infrastructure. As well, the relative silence by community NRM leaders on supporting and regulating ecosystem services may reveal a lack of understanding of these functions rather than a discord in values. The tested methodology provides one approach to understanding the values of important advisory groups that are increasingly being required to guide regional agencies that implement natural resource management policy. Results indicate that, in practice, the values expressed may at times be confrontingly anthropocentric, although those interviewed also expressed existence values. Greater understanding of values is a prerequisite to the design of improved natural resource management.
“…An outcome is that regional actors and overriding government policies are often discordant at the fundamental level of motivation. The setting and attainment of resource condition targets is sometimes viewed as the means to achieving the social "end" for a regional community (Wallington et al 2008). However, without a better understanding of the values of each group, how they relate to each other, and how these values are expressed in NRM, public policy in this domain may consistently fall short of expectations.…”
ABSTRACT. We report on a grounded theory research methodology to elicit the values that underpin community leaders' advice on regional natural resource management. In-depth, semi-structured in-person interviews of 56 community leaders permitted respondents to explore their values and to elucidate some trade-offs. Furthermore, analysis of the coded transcripts provides evidence of the anthropocentric nature of values, and the importance of people, communities, and physical infrastructure. As well, the relative silence by community NRM leaders on supporting and regulating ecosystem services may reveal a lack of understanding of these functions rather than a discord in values. The tested methodology provides one approach to understanding the values of important advisory groups that are increasingly being required to guide regional agencies that implement natural resource management policy. Results indicate that, in practice, the values expressed may at times be confrontingly anthropocentric, although those interviewed also expressed existence values. Greater understanding of values is a prerequisite to the design of improved natural resource management.
“…A number of empirically and theoretically grounded evaluative frameworks exist to analyse governance systems (Burns, 2006;Hill & Hupe, 2006;Kenward et al, 2011;Ostrom, 2009;Pahl-Wostl, 2009;Sabatier & Jenkins-Smith, 1993;Wallington et al, 2008). The use of these evaluative frameworks in practice has varied, with some used more extensively (e.g.…”
“…Thus, legitimacy depends on the extent to which a decision is acceptable to the participants of the process (Adger et al 2003), who is involved as a participant and how representative participants are for the actual stakeholders groups (Green 2010). It also involves the acceptance or the acknowledgement of suitable power to a certain decisionmaking authority (social approval of using power) (Wallington et al 2008), which in turn requires an assumption of the desirable and proper action of Legitimacy of site selection processes across Europe: Social construction of legitimacy in three European countries Joanna cent, Małgorzata grodzińska-Jurczak, agata Pietrzyk-kaszyńska, riikka PalonieMi, eVangelia aPostoloPoulou, anna salomaa, mariana a. tsianou, JuKKa similä, JoHn d. Pantis this entity (Schlossberg and Shuford 2005).…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.