Reflections on social enterprise and the Big Society

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this reflective paper is to examine the implications for the UK of Prime Minister David Cameron's declared belief that a Big Society of community entrepreneurs and volunteers will take on more and more responsibilities. Sometimes policies are spelt out in detail; this was much more conceptual and perhaps visionary.Design/methodology/approachIdeas on sense making and performance evaluation were used to provide a context and explore how various people might be expected to react.FindingsWhilst the limited funding which accompanies the Big Society initiative will attract entrepreneurial opportunists who will be encouraged to bid for this money, if this new challenge is to succeed it must attract community entrepreneurs who see it as encouragement to start some new local initiative. Volunteering will be central to this. Positive outcomes are by no means certain.Research limitations/implicationsAs things emerge and develop there will be a number of opportunities for detailed and perhaps longitudinal research into the relative success or failure of the Big Society and this devolved approach to community enterprise.Practical implicationsTalking about the Big Society and thinking about the possibilities might well encourage would‐be community entrepreneurs to step forward.Originality/valueIt has been argued previously that “entrepreneurship enablers” are important in economic and social regeneration. They help make it possible for would‐be entrepreneurs to emerge and succeed. This short paper expands on this argument.

Community based forest enterprises in Britain: Two organising typologies

“…Government in all three countries now supports community action through enterprise and social enterprise development (Bailey, 2012;Thompson, 2011). This includes the woodland sector.…”

Defining the Social Enterprise: A Tangled Web

“…Sometimes the distinction is made explicit, e.g. social enterprise as an activity or social enterprise as an entity (Thompson, 2011) which is helpful. For clarity, in this article we are referring social enterprise (noun) as an organisation rather than an activity.…”

Communicating a social agenda within HEIs: the role of the social enterprise mark

“…Moreover, the dual purpose "hybrid" (see Doherty et al, 2014) nature of HEIs (i.e. pursuing a mixture of social objectives and profitmaking objectives) has meant that they are considered by many to be the natural successor to cash-strapped local authorities, given that they possess both the available resources and the requisite public commitment to the local community to engage effectively (Thompson, 2011;Mannion, 2016). However, evidence suggests that there remains a lack of awareness among HEI stakeholders about current initiatives within their institutions to advance a social agenda (Djordjevic & Cotton, 2011;Lozano, 2011).…”