2009
DOI: 10.1086/599549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflections on Popular Science in Britain: Genres, Categories, and Historians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aspiration to enact change in visitor's habits and engagement led to a shift in museology, aiming at turning visitors' attitudes from "cultural consumption to cultural Serious games production". This was initially the base philosophy of an initiative that originated in the UK, which was aimed at developing cultural and creative industries (O'Connor, 2009). This underpinning philosophy draws on a model suggested by Lash and Urry (1994), which proposes that cultural production has moved from being marginal or exceptional to a role as a template at the cutting edge of a post-modernist society.…”
Section: Itse 164mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aspiration to enact change in visitor's habits and engagement led to a shift in museology, aiming at turning visitors' attitudes from "cultural consumption to cultural Serious games production". This was initially the base philosophy of an initiative that originated in the UK, which was aimed at developing cultural and creative industries (O'Connor, 2009). This underpinning philosophy draws on a model suggested by Lash and Urry (1994), which proposes that cultural production has moved from being marginal or exceptional to a role as a template at the cutting edge of a post-modernist society.…”
Section: Itse 164mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Yet as O'Connor has argued, the term "popular science" itself has always been a vague category that cannot by itself do serious analytical work, but can be useful to convey a specific subject area without implying a single model for the diffusion of knowledge. 7 Indeed, Secord's phrase "knowledge in transit" is also a vague category that cannot support much analysis by itself.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the nearly thirty-year-old ongoing debate, see Topham 2009. Here I shall be using the historical phrase (or, “umbrella label”) “popular science” which, like “popularization of science,” handled correctly may serve as a useful tool of communication within the history and sociology of science, technology, and medicine, as well as with other disciplines, not to mention scientists, students, and the lay public (Govoni [2002] 2011, 20–21; Lightman 2007, 9–10; O'Connor 2009, 333). At present our knowledge of nineteenth and twentieth centuries Italian popular science is limited to its “top-down” manifestations: literature produced by the experts and professional scientists involved in exposing science to a lay public.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%