2019
DOI: 10.1080/0305764x.2019.1581134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflections on peer feedback in disciplinary courses as a tool in pre-service teacher training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, providing feedback is challenging, and university students often have difficulty writing high-quality, content-related feedback for their peers (e.g., Kaufman and Schunn 2011;van den Berg et al 2006). Even teacher students, who should be familiar with evaluating others' academic achievements, have such difficulties (e.g., related to negative beliefs about peer feedback or feeling unconfident; Alqassab et al 2018;Seroussi et al 2019). It is therefore important to support this process, for example, via procedural facilitation.…”
Section: Digital Support Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, providing feedback is challenging, and university students often have difficulty writing high-quality, content-related feedback for their peers (e.g., Kaufman and Schunn 2011;van den Berg et al 2006). Even teacher students, who should be familiar with evaluating others' academic achievements, have such difficulties (e.g., related to negative beliefs about peer feedback or feeling unconfident; Alqassab et al 2018;Seroussi et al 2019). It is therefore important to support this process, for example, via procedural facilitation.…”
Section: Digital Support Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, feedback should not only come from the teacher educator. Although, this type of feedback is predominant (Gan et al, 2018), promoting peer assessment and self-reflection on learning is also essential (Leko et al, 2015;Seroussi et al, 2019) as it allows learning from mistakes (Hattie and Timperley, 2007). For example, through performance observation in simulations or real enactments (in person or by video) (Anthony et al, 2015;DeMink-Carthew et al, 2017;Mitchell and Reid, 2017).…”
Section: Feedback On Assessment Tasks Within Practice-based Curriculummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, it is not always accepted by students [23] and a negative attitude towards PFB also impairs the benefits it can bring [24,25]. The involvement of social interactions in peer feedback influences its outcomes in complex ways [12,21,26,27]: for instance, discomfort due to the fear of hurting a peer may diminish the motivation to participate in PFB [28], and peer pressure often impairs the reliability of the feedback [26,29]. Thus, this learning method suffers from both a gender bias and gender differences: the content of PFB is sometimes guided by the receiver's gender (gender bias) [30,31], and students' willingness and ways to provide PFB seems to be gender-dependent (gender difference).…”
Section: The Possible Gender Discrepancies In Peer Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, not every participative learning strategy implies genders equity. Specifically, providing peer feedback is sometimes experienced quite differently by male and female students [9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%