2017
DOI: 10.1002/smj.2680
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflections on entry timing and innovation strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of innovation strategy is conceptualized as levers which managers pursue to innovate (Klingebiel and Joseph, 2017), and affects on firm performance (Erzurumlu, 2017;Tidd and Bessant, 2018).…”
Section: Strategy and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of innovation strategy is conceptualized as levers which managers pursue to innovate (Klingebiel and Joseph, 2017), and affects on firm performance (Erzurumlu, 2017;Tidd and Bessant, 2018).…”
Section: Strategy and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Ener (2019) concluded that greater top management experience can have less value in fast-changing markets on an example of biotechnology industry. An early entry-an entry during the evolution phase of an ILC-is associated with fast-changing markets and greater risk (Klingebiel & Joseph, 2017) because the dominant technology is not identified at this stage of an ILC. Since the length of prior management experience negatively correlates with R&D (Dane, 2010)-it has a negative effect on innovation, because managers become rigid to experimentation, and tend stick to their ways of doing things rather than exploring new practises (Sørensen & Stuart, 2000).…”
Section: A Destructive Effect Of the Prior Industry Experience Of Exe...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, scholarly enquiry into strategic decision-making within the context of entry-timing advantages during the maturity phase of ILC in general, and particularly with reference to fast-paced technological industries, is exiguous. This is a significant gap; in the past few decades, scholars reviewed the order of entry (Lieberman & Montgomery, 1988, 2013Garcia-Sanchez, Mesquita, & Vassolo, 2013), entry timing in relation to industry competitive structure (Klingebiel & Joseph, 2017;Cawley, 2019), entry timing in relation to functional product evolution (Querbes, & Frenken, 2016); entry advantages during the industry incubation and evolution life cycle phases (Uzunca, 2018;Furr, 2018); and the relationship between entry-timing and firms' capabilities (Lee, 2009;Robinson, Fornell, & Sullivan, 1992). Although different stages of ILC demand individual sets of capabilities (Lee, 2009), academic literature on capability precedents of a firm's entry in connection to ILC theory previously focused predominantly on the evolution phase of ILC (Moeen, Agarwal, Shah, 2020 ;Moeen & Agarwal, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%