Reflections on combining action research and actor-network theory

Abstract

In this paper, I address two questions: do their dissimilarities prevent action research and actor-network theory from being used together? If not, how can they complement each other? To do so, I discuss literature from each approach, the only two studies I found that combine action research and actor-network theory (both from organization management) and anecdotes from my field-work experience on the participatory management of urban spaces. On one hand, combining action research and actor-network theory helped me deal with the unpredictability of collaborative research projects by (1) helping me adapt to circumstances while remaining aware of my agency and (2) report systematically on diverse interactions while also letting a shared vocabulary and narrative emerge. On the other, my adherence to the principles of each approach and the comparability of my experience were affected by a lack of both time and control over the processes in which I was involved. I hope to support a debate that crosses disciplinary and methodological boundaries about the realities of doing collaborative inquiry, not by seeking normative statements about research practice, but by emphasizing how the latter cannot exist without a complex network of relations that inevitably affect its validity.

Actor‐network analysis of community‐based organisations in health pandemics: evidence from the COVID‐19 response in Freetown, Sierra Leone

“…Here, CBOs' participation can help to support the government in developing a comprehensive understanding and response to health disasters at the community level. CBOs will also benefit by gaining consensus on priorities within actor-networks, comprehending how they can adjust their operations in support of community priorities to remain relevant, and survive (Piovesan, 2020), and identifying resources for meeting the needs of the community (Riggs et al, 2020). Overall, our results show that there is strong potential for CBO-driven actor-networks in Freetown to work collaboratively towards addressing health disasters.…”

“…These actants are assembled to comprehend, build knowledge of, and influence the successes and failures of societal processes and outcomes (Fenwick, 2010). By understanding actants and their associations, scholars develop actor-networks that characterise actants (Latour, 2005), their influences on each other, the coalitions and alliances they form, and their competing and/or complementary goals or agendas (Callon, 1986;Latour, 2005;Piovesan, 2020).…”

Practicalities of implementing burden of disease research in Africa: lessons from a population survey component of our multi-partner FOCAL research project

“…Corresponding to the recommended practice in partnerships, we strived to build our partnership with open and transparent communications among partners [ 10 , 19 ]. We used email, and group voice and video calls for every interaction, and we plan in-person gatherings once in every project year.…”

Concepts and principles of the sustainable digital technologies use: process science and activity theory view

“…Along with the process science various action and activity theory approaches [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] to information operations research must be taken into consideration. This is necessary because of process science has not for now genuine concepts and methodologies of action research.…”