Reflections on Collaborative Ethnography and Decolonization in Latin America, Aotearoa, and Beyond

Abstract

As the ongoing legacies of colonialism are challenged, scholars and activists are increasingly carrying out collaborative research to respond to the asymmetrical privileges built into Western science by partnering with communities and explicitly orienting their research towards communities’ political aims. In this article, we trace the ways this shift intersects with other important trends in ethnographic research, especially attention to the politics of knowledge and decolonization. We discuss how collaborative research in Latin America is shaped by the context and political agendas of those involved to show what is produced. While in some circumstances collaboration can serve to level the colonial playing field by making Indigenous knowledge and practices visible, in other situations it can reinforce constructed dichotomies between Indigenous and Western knowledge and practices. As it increasingly the norm for government agencies, academic institutions, and non-governmental organizations to promote participatory methods to further their own agendas, we suggest that collaboration can be the site of governance as well as liberation. By bringing the dilemmas in our different research projects on Indigenous politics in Bolivia into dialogue with critical engagements from Indigenous scholars in Aotearoa and decolonial thinkers globally, we urge careful analysis of the multiple and changing standpoints of our collaborators in order not to re-construct essentialized notions of Indigeneity. Ultimately, we see the need to acknowledge the tight spaces of negotiation that we all find ourselves drawn into when we undertake collaborative endeavours.

Is There a Future for Indigenous People? The Application of the Ethnography Future Research to Assess the Indigenous People Sustainability

“…Smith [31] compares mainstream "topdown" ethics with what he calls "community-up" ethics, where research is conducted based on respect, listening, variety, reflection, respect for dignity, and not showing off knowledge in front of Indigenous Peoples. The aim is to have a consensual and trusting relationship between researchers and Indigenous Peoples [60], [61]. In this connection, George et al [62] make a pretty good point that if Indigenous Peoples do not feel safe or the research will not neglect their voices, they are unlikely to pass on their knowledge to researchers.…”

Carceral and Colonial Memory During Pandemic Times in the Philippines

“…Ellaine also invited San Nicolas elected official Malou Manlangit to help set up the pantry. I am unsure if setting up our pantry could be called a collaboration and if it is one shaped by our various agendas and positionalities (Kennemore and Postero 2020), but it was clear to me that we came together as neighbours wanting to address an urgent need affecting our community. All three of us combed our respective local and transnational networks to invite others to join our cause (Figure 1).…”

‘My Grandmother Never Told Me That Before!’

“…In this paper our aim is to critically reflect upon our attempts to produce possible subaltern counter-narratives to mainstream Vietnamese state discourses of Hmong culture and history (Kennemore and Postero 2020). We focus on the oral history segment of this project while detailing the collaborative process we developed, highlighting the strengths and drawbacks of our approach.…”