2018
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflections on, and visions for, the changing field of pollination ecology

Abstract: Since the launch of Ecology Letters in 1998, the field of Pollination Ecology has changed considerably in its focus. In this review, we discuss the major discoveries across the past two decades. We quantitatively synthesise the frequency by which different concepts and topics appeared in the peer-reviewed literature, as well as the connections between these topics. We then look forward to identify pressing research frontiers and opportunities for additional integration in the future. We find that there has bee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
38
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 159 publications
(187 reference statements)
1
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, sampling effort and its temporal distribution per network should be standardized within individual studies. For meta‐analyses, the construction of appropriate networks will be facilitated if authors publish space‐ and time‐explicit data, rather than already aggregated data (Knight et al ). It is important to note that despite standardized sampling, networks can still differ in their underlying temporal dynamics: the same temporal extent may cover different proportions of the full flowering season depending on geographic position – even at the same locality, the same temporal extent may capture different levels of diversity depending on the season (Cuartas‐Hernández and Medel , Souza et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, sampling effort and its temporal distribution per network should be standardized within individual studies. For meta‐analyses, the construction of appropriate networks will be facilitated if authors publish space‐ and time‐explicit data, rather than already aggregated data (Knight et al ). It is important to note that despite standardized sampling, networks can still differ in their underlying temporal dynamics: the same temporal extent may cover different proportions of the full flowering season depending on geographic position – even at the same locality, the same temporal extent may capture different levels of diversity depending on the season (Cuartas‐Hernández and Medel , Souza et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is potentially true for other plant–pollinator mutualisms. However, our ability to predict climate‐change impacts on plant–pollinator mutualisms is hampered by knowledge gaps and a lack of baseline data on pollination systems in many regions of the world including Australasia (Knight et al, ). This work reinforces the need to understand ecosystem processes underlying reproductive success if we are to improve our understanding of and accurately predict range shifts in plants and their pollinators in response to climate change or any other environmental change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diverse land uses within European cities can be very rich in native flowering plant species 14,15 and there is also an increasing interest in the potential of (outdoor) urban agriculture in ensuring food security 16 . Yet the impact of urbanisation on the pollination of wild and cultivated plants remains poorly known 17 . We also lack direct comparison with rural sites, which are typically dominated by agricultural land use and where pollinators are vital for crop pollination, yet where agricultural intensification is thought to result in reduced provision of a range of ecosystem services provided by insects, including pollination 18 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%