Setting the StageM UCH HAS BEEN SAID over the last two decades about American college and university faculty. For the 1990s in particular, a maelstrom of critique from trustees, legislators, the popular press, faculty unions, and policymakers addressed needs for "reform" in how faculty are recruited, socialized, and rewarded throughout their careers. What has followed has been much quieter, however. Efforts have been made to redefine scholarship in reward systems, to implement post-tenure review systems, and to make the system fairer for women and minority faculty. How faculty go about their work has changed fundamentally with increasing use of technology, and faculty have become more involved in what Boyer (1990), Rice (1996), and have called the scholarships of teaching and community engagement (see also Hutchings and Shulman, 1999). Additionally, the composition of the American faculty has begun to change as more women and faculty of color have joined the professoriate, though many still find glass ceilings hindering career advancement-at times ceilings that appear made of Plexiglas (Terosky, Phifer, and Neumann, 2008). Admittedly, American higher education leaders and policymakers have not done away with the tenure system; that said, dramatic increases in part-time and non-tenure-track appointments has rendered the tenure system as less relevant to increasing numbers of academics (Schuster and Finkelstein, 2006).What is the history of the rhetoric, policy reform, and research on faculty over the last two decades, and what is missing in the dialogue? The purpose of this volume is to review and synthesize the literature on the American higher education faculty over the last fifteen to twenty years. As career-long students Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com) •