2010
DOI: 10.1332/174426410x535891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflections of ‘knowledge exchange professionals’ in the social sciences: emerging opportunities and challenges for university-based knowledge brokers

Abstract: Through reflections on our own experiences, this paper explores one approach to knowledge exchange that appears to be being used increasingly in social sciences in Scottish universities: the employment of dedicated “knowledge exchange professionals” or knowledge brokers. We argue that the ambiguity and hybridity of specialist knowledge exchange roles as they are emerging currently in university social science settings lead to challenges, though also opportunities, at different stages of knowledge exchange appo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The positions described above both involve directing KE activities for our respective institutions. Unlike the KB roles described by Knight and Lightowler (2010), we each lead a complement of KB. The focus of these posts is solely on brokering -there is no ambiguity of role nor are their roles research/KE hybrids as described by Knight and Lightowler (2010).…”
Section: Context: Who We Arementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The positions described above both involve directing KE activities for our respective institutions. Unlike the KB roles described by Knight and Lightowler (2010), we each lead a complement of KB. The focus of these posts is solely on brokering -there is no ambiguity of role nor are their roles research/KE hybrids as described by Knight and Lightowler (2010).…”
Section: Context: Who We Arementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the KB roles described by Knight and Lightowler (2010), we each lead a complement of KB. The focus of these posts is solely on brokering -there is no ambiguity of role nor are their roles research/KE hybrids as described by Knight and Lightowler (2010). Both York University's KMb Unit and the CRFR with partners across Scottish universities, broker relationships between academic researchers and non-academic decision makers to enable the creation and use of evidence that not only informs public policy and professional practice but may also be disseminated through traditional scholarly channels.…”
Section: Context: Who We Arementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Knowledge brokering roles or functions are often referred to in the literature using a range of alternative terms -these include intermediaries (Levin, 2004;Sin, 2008), policy entrepreneurs (Edwards 2004), boundary spanner (Ward et al, 2009a), research translators (Ward et al 2009a), champions (Cherney & Head, 2010), boundary objects (Kimble et al, 2010), liaison officers (Tetroe et al, 2008), third space professionals (Whitchurch, 2009), innovation broker (Horne 2008), boundary organisations (Crona & Parker, 2011), diffusion fellows (Rowley, 2012), and knowledge exchange professionals (Knight & Lightowler, 2010).…”
Section: Research Utilisation As a Social Process -Mobilising Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%