2020
DOI: 10.1111/hex.13088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflections, impact and recommendations of a co‐produced qualitative study with young people who have experience of mental health difficulties

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
103
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…"Co-production" is not a quick process [31]. Planning, resourcing, staffing, executing PPI meetings and building rapport with the members is timeintensive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"Co-production" is not a quick process [31]. Planning, resourcing, staffing, executing PPI meetings and building rapport with the members is timeintensive.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Member consistency has been identified as a challenge in other projects due to factors such as unavailability and perceived demands of the meetings (53). Similarly, a recent reflection on co-designing a research project with young people highlighted that although strong relationships were formed with young people who were involved in data collection and analysis were, it was harder to build such relationships with young people not involved in these areas of the project due to their role activity being intermittent (45). The delay between the Actissist proof-of-concept RCT finishing and main RCT starting made it difficult to maintain member consistency, resulting in different members taking part in the proof-of-concept RCT ERG and main RCT ERG meetings.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Young people can participate directly in research as peer researchers, giving them new skills and simultaneously enhancing access to seldom-heard groups. 16 More equitable relationships are key; communities will engage if benefits are mutual. Careful attention must be paid to the human and financial resources needed for engagement and providing neutral physical and virtual spaces where communities, health professionals and researchers can work together.…”
Section: How Can We Promote Sustainable Engagement With Parents and Cmentioning
confidence: 99%