Reflections From Applying Intersectionality to a Constructivist Grounded Theory Study on Intimate Partner Violence and Trauma

Abstract

In this research note, I reflect on conducting a qualitative study on trauma and intimate partner violence (IPV), applying an intersectional lens to constructivist grounded theory methodology. I argue that despite offering an ability to critically examine socially constructed categories of identity, and providing a way to ensure the active inclusion of social justice goals into research, intersectionality is underused within social work research. I also reflect on the particular importance of an intersectional lens in countering the previously identified assumptions of sameness underlying IPV and trauma services. From recounting my research process, I discuss recommendations for further intersectional research, and research on trauma. Recommendations include allowing enough time for recruitment and analysis, making visible the researcher’s role, including a participatory element in studies, and ensuring continuous critical and reflexive processing at all research stages.

A Way Forward with Intersectionality: An Integrative Review of Women’s Experiences with Intimate Partner Violence

“…The studies were conducted in Canada (n = 3) and South Africa (n = 1). For clarity regarding the ndings below, two of the four articles begin with the same author's name, resulting in Baird 31 and Baird 32 . (2019).…”

“…All four articles [31][32][33][34] labeled intimate partner violence within the context of a human rights issue and/or a public health challenge. Women were identi ed as victims in all four articles, and all articles commented on the need to view IPV from the lens of marginalized populations, such as LGBTQ, immigrants, disabilities, and women of color.…”

“…This author's 32 argument for IPV is heavily blended with trauma as the focus. Baird 31 echoes Holtmann in mentioning IPV brie y in terms of how past research has focused on the experiences of white woman, predominantly, but has not explicitly provided a de nition. Baird et al references "types of abuse" but does speci c, nor are nancial or economic abuse explicitly mentioned.…”

“…Though not directly linked to her study participants, Baird 31 mentions the importance of destigmatizing IPV within society as a critical element of enabling women to heal. Holtmann 34 stated that "Language barriers, cultural values based in patriarchy and collectivism, and not having their usual support system nearby, due to the migration experience, result in feelings of isolation and social exclusion (p. 296)".…”

“…Van der Heijden 34 had similar ndings but also suggested further research is required to provide clarity to women's agency and resilience, as well as discover protective factors that could be useful beyond their experiences with violence. Similarly, in relation to trauma and IPV, Baird 31 commented that the self-determination of women is key and that after experiences with violence women "are overwhelmingly resilient and heal in a myriad of ways" (p. 7).…”