2022
DOI: 10.1177/02632764221112341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflections and Hypotheses on a Further Structural Transformation of the Political Public Sphere

Abstract: This article contains reflections on the further structural transformation of the public sphere, building on the author’s widely-discussed social-historical study, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere, which originally appeared in German in 1962 (English translation 1989). The first three sections contain preliminary theoretical reflections on the relationship between normative and empirical theory, the deliberative understanding of democracy, and the demanding preconditions of the stability of d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
93
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
93
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, in the field of social and political sciences, scholars have talked about how global commercial online technologies may constitute a new structural transformation of how our public spheres are shaped (Seeliger & Sevignani, 2022); what role private social media platforms may play in creating social silos (Habermas, 2022), or in appropriating citizens’ participation in socio-political deliberations for profit (Staab & Thiel, 2022). Others have argued that such capacities may be employed to foster ‘deliberative e-rulemaking’, that is, ‘the development of [a] law-making environment online which enables and facilitates public participation’ (Deligiaouri & Suiter, 2020, p. 4).…”
Section: Platform Governance and Public Deliberationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, in the field of social and political sciences, scholars have talked about how global commercial online technologies may constitute a new structural transformation of how our public spheres are shaped (Seeliger & Sevignani, 2022); what role private social media platforms may play in creating social silos (Habermas, 2022), or in appropriating citizens’ participation in socio-political deliberations for profit (Staab & Thiel, 2022). Others have argued that such capacities may be employed to foster ‘deliberative e-rulemaking’, that is, ‘the development of [a] law-making environment online which enables and facilitates public participation’ (Deligiaouri & Suiter, 2020, p. 4).…”
Section: Platform Governance and Public Deliberationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In essence, Habermas reproduces the criticism of the development of filter bubbles and echo chambers as an effect of algorithmic dispersion. He acknowledges that a socio-economic analysis would be of great benefit but has not attempted to elaborate one himself (Habermas, 2022).…”
Section: The Political Theory Of the Public Sphere In Transitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He acknowledges that a socio-economic analysis would be of great benefit but has not attempted to elaborate one himself (Habermas, 2022).…”
Section: The Political Theory Of the Public Sphere In Transitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The public sphere is based on the assumption of its independence from the state and the market, rather than as a forum for debate and democratic control (Habermas, 2022). Looking at the reception of the issue of public inspection in the organizational identity of the Union, it is a closed project.…”
Section: The Importance Of the Discourse Of European Identity In The ...mentioning
confidence: 99%