1990
DOI: 10.1016/0021-8693(90)90149-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflection subgroups of Coxeter systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
203
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
4
203
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classification (b) was conjectured (in equivalent form) and partly proved by Coxeter [5] and was proved in [8]. The proof here via the stronger result (a) is along similar lines, but it is much simpler and independent of the classification of affine Weyl groups.…”
Section: Subsystems Of Affine Root Systems Imentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The classification (b) was conjectured (in equivalent form) and partly proved by Coxeter [5] and was proved in [8]. The proof here via the stronger result (a) is along similar lines, but it is much simpler and independent of the classification of affine Weyl groups.…”
Section: Subsystems Of Affine Root Systems Imentioning
confidence: 77%
“…A classification (up to isomorphism) of the reflection subgroups of an affine Weyl group in terms of those of the corresponding finite Weyl group was conjectured and partly proved by Coxeter [5], and completed in [8]. The paper [12] includes explicit lists of the possible isomorphism types of maximal reflection subgroups and describes a procedure by which all reflection subgroups of a given affine Weyl group can be obtained.…”
Section: The Plan Of This Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If W ⊂ W is a reflection subgroup, it is a well-known theorem due (independently) to Deodhar [3] and Dyer [4] that W is a Coxeter group w.r.t. a set S = {s γ i : i = 1 · · · k} of reflection generators.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are subgroups W ⊂ W generated by reflections (conjugates of elements of S); they exhibit many of the same properties as parabolic subgroups [3], [4], e.g. (i) W is a Coxeter group in its own right, (ii) ∃ unique minimal length left coset representatives for W in W , etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation