2000
DOI: 10.1002/etc.5620190101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflection on whole effluent toxicity: The Pellston workshops

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whole effluent toxicity (WET) testing and the development of WET strategies and methods have become an important part of applied ecotoxicology. Because effluents are a main source of direct and continuous input of pollutants in aquatic ecosystems, the study of the effects of effluent exposure on organisms has a high ecological relevance [1–3]. However, relating observed effects to specific pollutants or even classes of pollutants remains a very difficult task due to the usually unknown, complex, and variable composition of effluents [4–6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whole effluent toxicity (WET) testing and the development of WET strategies and methods have become an important part of applied ecotoxicology. Because effluents are a main source of direct and continuous input of pollutants in aquatic ecosystems, the study of the effects of effluent exposure on organisms has a high ecological relevance [1–3]. However, relating observed effects to specific pollutants or even classes of pollutants remains a very difficult task due to the usually unknown, complex, and variable composition of effluents [4–6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WET and similar toxicity tests integrate interactions among complex mixtures of contaminants (Chapman 2000;Wharfe 2004;Wharfe et al 2004). They measure the total toxic effect, regardless of physical and chemical composition (Chapman 2000), being considered effective tools for predicting instream impacts induced by different kinds of contamination sources (Ausley 2000;de Vlaming et al 2000;Diamond and Daley 2000;Hutchings et al 2004). Notwithstanding, similar procedures have already been applied in bioassays with sediment elutriates to evaluate their toxicity (Cheung et al 1997;Pardos et al 1998;Wong et al 1999;Baun et al 2002;Müller et al 2002), as sediment acts as a sink of contaminants, which can be exchanged between the sediment and the aqueous phase due to disposal, stormwater runoff and water turbulence (Ankley et al 1991;Mucha et al 2003), which is likely to occur during the drainage of rice fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For regulatory purposes, whole effluent toxicity assessment methods have been proposed to estimate the risk of effluents discharged in freshwater streams (e.g., at Pellston Workshops [1] and by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [2]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single‐species bioassays are often used to identify effluent hazard but not to identify risk: These tests provide data only for the first step of risk assessment [4]. To thoroughly assess environmental impacts, specific chemical approaches, bioaccumulation assessments, and field population surveys can be used to complement the results of bioassays [1]. This collective approach constitutes the basis of the regulatory procedures of effluent hazard assessment in both the United States and Canada [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation