1982
DOI: 10.1016/0022-460x(82)90468-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflection of sound by a boundary layer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This trend starts to become evident at ever-smaller angles of incidence as the Mach number increases. According to Brand & Nagel (1982), as one approaches the acoustic waves are refracted away from the wall and hence the acoustic-field boundary layer signature is weakened. This effect is all the more pronounced as the Mach number increases and explains the decreasing receptivity levels at high angles of incidence.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Comparison With Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This trend starts to become evident at ever-smaller angles of incidence as the Mach number increases. According to Brand & Nagel (1982), as one approaches the acoustic waves are refracted away from the wall and hence the acoustic-field boundary layer signature is weakened. This effect is all the more pronounced as the Mach number increases and explains the decreasing receptivity levels at high angles of incidence.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Comparison With Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This trend starts to become evident at ever-smaller angles of incidence as the Mach number increases. According to Brand & Nagel (1982), as one approaches Θ = 180 • the acoustic waves are refracted away from the wall…”
Section: Adjoint Hlns Comparison With Finite Reynolds Number Theory (mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] have addressed the problem of propagation in lined flow ducts for adiabatic, inviscid sound propagation. In these cases, they have assumed continuity of displacement at the wall since it seems to be the more appropriate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, we study the inviscid limit of the governing equations. This analysis is similar to that of [Duck, 1990], however the technique to derive the acoustic reflection coefficient is based on the work of [Brand and Nagel, 1982]. A complete disturbance profile is obtained by introducing an inner viscous layer that satisfies the no-slip condition and deriving composite solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%