Reflection of Political Restructuring on Urban Symbols: The Case of Presidential Palace in Ankara, Turkey

Abstract

Ankara, capital of Turkey has been the revolution space of the country after the proclamation of republic in 1923. The city has carried out the urban symbols of the republican ideology and modernity vision created by the nationalist administrators and elites. The newly established state used architecture and urban planning in transmitting the ideals of national unity and sovereignty by breaking off its ties from Ottoman heritage. After the span of eighty years, Turkey has experienced a new political hegemony. Post-2000s’ political approach changed the urban symbols of early Republican period and redesigned the capital in line with its ideological basis. One of the most concrete transformations is observed in the presidential palace of the country which conveys the political intents of each period through its spatial and architectural organizations. This study, therefore, aims to put forward the change in urban symbols and their meanings by focusing on the presidential palace. The palaces are investigated in observational domains; their spatial configurations, buildings, and symbols in relation to the political intents on urban areas and public realm. This paper concludes that in both periods presidential palaces with respect to their spatial and architectural designs are regarded as the icons in representing the dominant political power; the former used it as an instrument of national sovereignty whereas the latter used it as a mark of dominancy over the nation.

Understanding the Political and Religious Implications of Turkish Civil Religion in The Netherlands: A Critical Discourse Analysis of ISN Friday Sermons

“…The 'banal Ottomanism' that Erdo gan currently practices is a symbolic part of the re-identification of Turkish society (Mandacı 2022). New urban architecture, such as that of the Presidential Complex or the mosque in Taksim Square, bears witness to the Ottoman heritage that has been lost (Orhan 2016).…”

The spatialization of Islamist, populist, and neo-Ottoman discourses in the Turkish capital under AKP rule

“…-Recep Tayyip Erdogan The new presidential complex was constructed within the territory of the Atatürk Forest Farm as a service building for the Office of the Prime Minister, utilizing an 18th-century Ottoman-Islamic architectural style. 55 After the 2014 presidential elections, which represent a turning point in the political history of the Republic of Turkey, it became the residence of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan. 56 Erdogan's relocation to the new site not only after the elections, 57 but also after accepting congratulations in the complex on the occasion of Republic Day on October 29, 2014, served as a symbolization of this turning point, especially as this same day marked the starting date of the official use of this palace.…”

Using GIS and the Diversity Indices: A Combined Approach to Woody Plant Diversity in the Urban Landscape

“…It is a system of equipment and methods designed to solve complex planning and management problems, including the querying, processing, analysis, modeling, visualization, and management of data located in a space. It depends on spatial data, verbal and graphical information, etc., and has a structure that stores this data in an integrated way [26]. In landscape architecture, GIS studies refer to point and spatial analysis and evaluations, and to planning and decision-making stages on a much higher scale.…”