2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2010.00320.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflection in psychoanalysis: On symbols and metaphors

Abstract: Psychoanalysis is an art of reflection, i.e. it tries to facilitate the subject's retrieval of his own self. The 'material' to be reflected upon consists of the products of human symbolization. But there are two views of reflection. In one, the self is searched in a temporal, structural and procedural 'anterior' (the model of archaeology). In the other the self is to be found in a still evolving meaning process, i.e. it resides in a 'future' (the model of teleology). Both these pictures are common in psychoana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many papers have addressed this issue during the last twenty years. An example is Enckell's (2010) contribution, in which he contrasts the "hermeneutics of suspicion" with the "hermeneutics of faith" (p. 1095). The particular terms chosen by Enckell are drawn from Ricoeur and applied to the dialectic between what is more usually called the archaeological and the transformative paradigms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many papers have addressed this issue during the last twenty years. An example is Enckell's (2010) contribution, in which he contrasts the "hermeneutics of suspicion" with the "hermeneutics of faith" (p. 1095). The particular terms chosen by Enckell are drawn from Ricoeur and applied to the dialectic between what is more usually called the archaeological and the transformative paradigms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the psychoanalytic literature, symbolic thinking refers to an unconscious mental process whereby sensory and somatic components of affective experience are translated into images and words, thus contributing to the development of a distinctive psychic self and the establishment of an intersubjective dialogue (Isaacs, 1948 ). Linking non-verbal experience with words allows the patient to differentiate between reality and fantasy and to acknowledge subjective feelings, so he can make sense of his experience (Bucci, 1997 ; Greenspan, 1997 ; Enckell, 2010 ). The conception of the body as a primary container of emotions (Bion, 1962 ; Anzieu, 1989 ), as well as the metaphor of “theater of the body” used by McDougall ( 1989 ), indicates that the body and its symptoms can represent unconscious conflicts that have not been mentalized.…”
Section: Alexithymiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rhetorical devices operating on the pre‐linguistic level emanate from individuals’ internal images of self and others, which shape their specific beliefs that might contradict ‘historical truth’ (Siegel, 2003, p. 80) and which help them to organize their discourses (Mulligan, 2017). Among the linguistic rhetorical devices, writers include metaphors, oxymorons, metonymies (Enckell, 2010), analogies, idioms, hyperboles, similes (Hook, 2000), repetitions of words or expressions, combining criticism and praises, and repeating the first words of a phrase at the end of the phrase (Cambridge Dictionary, 2019). These linguistic manoeuvres reinforce the speakers’ arguments and help them to ‘configure the moment’ by arousing the audience's emotions (Martin, 2016, p. 145).…”
Section: Rhetorical Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%