2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflection electron energy loss spectroscopy of nanometric oxide layers and of their interfaces with a substrate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to extract the dielectric function, it is first necessary to perform a decomposition into bulk and surface contributions of the experimental VEEL spectrum measured in inner beam geometry. The underlying assumption is that the single scattering cross section can be expressed as a linear combination of the bulk Im[−1/ε(ω)] and surface Im[−1/(1 + ε(ω))] energy loss functions: [ 51,52 ] Im []1ε=ε2ε12+ε22 Im []1ε+1=ε2ε1+12+ε22 where ε 1 and ε 2 are the real and imaginary parts of the total dielectric function ε. Here, we note that Equations (1) and (2) are typical for bulk materials, and can be modified in case of nanomaterials due to quantum confinement effects, as explained in ref.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to extract the dielectric function, it is first necessary to perform a decomposition into bulk and surface contributions of the experimental VEEL spectrum measured in inner beam geometry. The underlying assumption is that the single scattering cross section can be expressed as a linear combination of the bulk Im[−1/ε(ω)] and surface Im[−1/(1 + ε(ω))] energy loss functions: [ 51,52 ] Im []1ε=ε2ε12+ε22 Im []1ε+1=ε2ε1+12+ε22 where ε 1 and ε 2 are the real and imaginary parts of the total dielectric function ε. Here, we note that Equations (1) and (2) are typical for bulk materials, and can be modified in case of nanomaterials due to quantum confinement effects, as explained in ref.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,37,38 Furthermore, the E g electron affinity (E A ) and ionization potential (I P ) of the Zr-hybrid dielectric were extracted from the reflective electron energy loss spectroscopy (REELS) with low-loss spectra and ultra-violet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) (Figure S7a,b in Supporting Information). 39,40 The Zrhybrid dielectrics had an electron affinity (E A ) of 2.7−3.1 eV and an I P of 8.0−8.3 eV (Figure 4b). The Zr-hybrid dielectrics at different Zr concentrations had an energy band gap in the range of 5.2−5.4 eV and exhibited a sufficient valence-band offset of around 3.0 eV from the pentacene semiconductor.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While vacuum‐medium excitations have been extensively analysed, interface excitations occurring at the medium‐medium (“MM”) interface are up to now less considered. Since the pioneer work of Raether, a non‐negligible number of theoretical and experimental works about MM interface excitations has obviously been published, but there does not exist a general parameter – as the SEP for surface excitation – that characterizes MM interface excitation. It is precisely the goal of this work to propose an expression for the so‐called interface excitation parameter (IEP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%