2013
DOI: 10.3390/su5062327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflecting on Education for Sustainable Development through Two Lenses: Ability Studies and Disability Studies

Abstract: The call for papers asked to cast “a critical eye on the practice and purpose of sustainability-focused education, and its successes and failures, thus far”. We approach this task in this paper through two lenses that have not yet been very visible in the education for sustainable development (ESD) discourse. One is the lens of disability studies which is the inquiry around the lived reality of disabled people; the other is the lens of ability studies which among others investigates (a) which abilities are see… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sustainability was a theme mentioned in various ways. This is another discourse that in general is seen in need of disabled people to be present (Wolbring & Burke, 2013;. However readers do not obtain knowledge that would make them realize that need.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sustainability was a theme mentioned in various ways. This is another discourse that in general is seen in need of disabled people to be present (Wolbring & Burke, 2013;. However readers do not obtain knowledge that would make them realize that need.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is stated elsewhere [35] that ableism is a useful angle for the education for sustainable development discourse and we submit an ableism lens is useful for all SD discourses covered in this paper. The highlighted expectations also pose challenges for academia given the low level of disabled people within academia and the problematic sentiment toward disabled students [46] and to the output academics generate (open access or not or both; academic language or lay language or both) [15].…”
Section: Challenges For Academiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problems related to the imagery of disabled people is not a new one but is seen for a long time a pervasive issue [35,48,49] whether on the one hand the tragedy imagery the participants of the discussion forum disability and the Post-2015 development goal agenda [12] questioned a lot or the "supercrip" image where disabled people are portrait as heroically overcoming "their limitation" [50][51][52][53][54][55][56]. These imageries are detrimental to disabled people taking part in SD discourses as "normal" citizens indeed these imageries were seen as one cause of the lack of political and societal will to increase the social health of disabled people by the participants of the discussion forum disability and the Post-2015 development goal agenda [12].…”
Section: Attitude Toward Disabled Peoplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations