2002
DOI: 10.1094/cchem.2002.79.2.222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflectance and Transmittance Spectroscopy Applied to Detecting Fumonisin in Single Corn Kernels Infected with Fusarium verticillioides

Abstract: Reflectance and transmittance visible and near‐infrared spectroscopy were used to detect fumonisin in single corn kernels infected with Fusarium verticillioides. Kernels with >100 ppm and <10 ppm could be classed accurately as fumonisin positive or negative, respectively. Classification results were generally better for oriented kernels than for kernels that were randomly placed in the spectrometer viewing area. Generally, models based on reflectance spectra have higher correct classification than models based… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
65
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of applications have been reported using SKNIR in wheat and maize for quality and fungal infection [4][5][6][7][8]14,21,22,25 , as well as for protein 4,26 and hardness 4,17 in wheat. In barley, there have been a number of recent reports on SK measurements for grain hardness 2,13,[15][16][17]19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of applications have been reported using SKNIR in wheat and maize for quality and fungal infection [4][5][6][7][8]14,21,22,25 , as well as for protein 4,26 and hardness 4,17 in wheat. In barley, there have been a number of recent reports on SK measurements for grain hardness 2,13,[15][16][17]19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the rejected nuts, they were 9.94 g (min 4.8, max 12.8) and 7.26 g (min 13.2, max 15.8) with SD and %RSD of 4.96 & 3.36% and 6.88 & 4.53% for the two air speeds, respectively. In fact low density (S/N<1.5) nuts may be more prone to aflatoxin contamination than the high density ones (De-Mello and Scussel, 2007) and have been reported by other authors for grains and nuts (Dowell et al, 2002;Huff, 1980;Pearson and Wicklow, 2006). It is important to emphasize that, although, the lightest nuts blew off with the air stream, some heavy (healthy) nuts were also rejected (blown off) during the density sorting.…”
Section: Nut Shell Color Size and Densitymentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Those tissue alterations scatter the NIR beam reducing its transmittance when it crosses the entire in-shell nut material giving readings different of that obtained in the healthy nuts (Dowell et al, 2002;Wicklow and Pearson, 2006;Pearson, 1999;Pearson and Young, 2002).…”
Section: Inner In-shell Nut Deteriorationmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations