1986
DOI: 10.1364/ao.25.000431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reflectance and albedo differences between wet and dry surfaces

Abstract: It is commonly observed that natural multiple-scattering media such as sand and soils become noticeably darker when wet. The primary reason for this is that changing the medium surrounding the particles from air to water decreases their relative refractive index, hence increases the average degree of forwardness of scattering as determined by the asymmetry parameter (mean cosine of the scattering angle). As a consequence, incident photons have to be scattered more times before reemerging from the medium and ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
85
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 3(a) shows the large variability in magnitude and spectral shape of surface albedo and nadir surface reflectance between 400 nm and 2,500 nm (1,700 nm for ocean albedo example) for a variety of typical surface types. For a Lambertian surface, the spectral surface reflectance and albedo are essentially equivalent [25,26] and validation studies comparing the surface reflectance retrieved from satellite measurements using a Lambertian assumption to ground-based measurements show good agreement with residual standard errors of approximately 0.02 [27]. Observational Period [19] and is the baseline surface albedo used in the forward modeling calculations of this work.…”
Section: Representation Of Error Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3(a) shows the large variability in magnitude and spectral shape of surface albedo and nadir surface reflectance between 400 nm and 2,500 nm (1,700 nm for ocean albedo example) for a variety of typical surface types. For a Lambertian surface, the spectral surface reflectance and albedo are essentially equivalent [25,26] and validation studies comparing the surface reflectance retrieved from satellite measurements using a Lambertian assumption to ground-based measurements show good agreement with residual standard errors of approximately 0.02 [27]. Observational Period [19] and is the baseline surface albedo used in the forward modeling calculations of this work.…”
Section: Representation Of Error Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10] Most of these studies are based on laboratory experiments [Twomey et al, 1986;Lobell and Asner, 2002;Liu et al, 2002] or theoretical approach [Ishida et al, 1991;Twomey et al, 1986]. Because they are generally motivated by the fact that albedo (or surface reflectance measured in the solar spectrum) is a potential proxy for soil moisture remote sensing, the authors try to establish a relationship as general as possible by using a large number of soil types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since wetting markedly changes the reflectance of most surfaces (Twomey et al 1986), aggregates and concretes not intentionally wetted were driedaggregates on a hot plate, and concretes with a hot-air gun-prior to albedo measurement.…”
Section: Albedo Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%