“…It has often been stated that the refitting of chipped stone artifacts can objectively unite isolated artifacts into larger units which make sense in terms of the formation process of an archaeological record. This has provided valuable data for the reconstruction of human behaviors as well as for understanding the taphonomy (e.g., an assessment of integrity of the context, the degree of post-depositional movement, and an approximate order of time that the assemblage represents) of an archaeological record in a site (e.g., Leroi-Gourhan and Brézillon, 1966;Cahen et al, 1979;Villa, 1982;Volkman, 1983;Skar and Coulson, 1986;Pigeot, 1987;Olive, 1988;Roebroeks, 1988;Bergman et al, 1990;Bodu et al, 1990;Cziesla, 1990;Morrow, 1996;Bamforth and Becker, 2000;Vaquero et al, 2007;Sumner and Kuman, 2014). Although the study of refitting in archaeology has a history of more than 100 years, its analytical importance has only been widely recognized in the last four decades (De Loecker et al, 2003).…”