2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refining Pseudo Labels with Clustering Consensus over Generations for Unsupervised Object Re-identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To tackle the challenge of pseudo label noise an approach was presented in [255]. They have refined the pseudo labels based on clustering consensus.…”
Section: Cnn-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To tackle the challenge of pseudo label noise an approach was presented in [255]. They have refined the pseudo labels based on clustering consensus.…”
Section: Cnn-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also minimize the loss function considering cluster centroids and feature samples stored in feature memory. RLCC [9] refines clusters by a consensus among iterations. Pseudo-labels on a certain iteration are created by considering the ones generated on a previous iteration, keeping the training stable.…”
Section: B Person Re-identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This clearly shows that Person ReID is a more demanding task than ImageNet classification, and general state-of-the-art self-supervised learning methods are not suitable for the task. These methods result in much less accurate models when compared to prior unsupervised learning methods tailored specifically to ReID, even with ImageNet weight initialization [9], [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various CL-based methods [6], [10]- [12], [18], [31], [35] have been developed for unsupervised Re-ID. Moreover, the issue of pseudo label noise occurred in unsupervised Re-ID has also been noticed recently and various methods [14], [16], [18]- [20] have been proposed to address it. We will introduce these related work and state the difference of our work in Section II-B and II-D.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It implies that the generated pseudo labels might be out of date. To deal with the inevitable label noise, efforts have been made in label refinement [14]- [16], hybrid contrastive learning [10], [12], [17] that combines cluster-and instance-level contrasts together, online pseudo label generation [18], and other techniques [19], [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%