2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2013.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refinements on fracture toughness of PUR foams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For mixed mode loading the Richard fracture criterion [20] gives better predictions of fracture limit and crack initiation angle. Marsavina et al [21,22] assess the mixed mode fracture criteria of three different densities of PUR foams and found that the Equivalent Stress Intensity Factor fits better the experimental results obtained using Asymmetric Semi-Circular Bend (ASCB) specimen. This study presents results on the elastic and mechanical properties in shear of polyurethane foams and the mode I and mode II fracture toughness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For mixed mode loading the Richard fracture criterion [20] gives better predictions of fracture limit and crack initiation angle. Marsavina et al [21,22] assess the mixed mode fracture criteria of three different densities of PUR foams and found that the Equivalent Stress Intensity Factor fits better the experimental results obtained using Asymmetric Semi-Circular Bend (ASCB) specimen. This study presents results on the elastic and mechanical properties in shear of polyurethane foams and the mode I and mode II fracture toughness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…ða=R; S 1 =R; S 2 =RÞ; i ¼ I; II ð3Þ f I ðS 2 =RÞ ¼ 6:235 S 2 =R ð Þ 3 À 15:069 S 2 =R ð Þ 2 þ 17:229ðS 2 =RÞ À 1:062 f II ðS 2 =RÞ ¼ 1:884 S 2 =R À5:075ðS 2 =RÞ þ 1:983 ð4ÞRef [21,22]. SEC K i ¼ p max ðb; a=WÞ; i ¼ I; II ð5Þ f I ðb; a=WÞ ¼ cos b…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elastic properties Young modulus and Poisson ratio were determined by Impulse Excitation Technique (ASTM E-1876-01). Tensile strength was determined on dog bone specimens according with a gage length of 50 mm and a cross section in the calibrated zone with 10 mm width and 4 mm thickness, according to EN ISO 527, and described in the research published by Marsavina et al [28]. The mode I and II fracture toughness were determined on asymmetric semi-circular bend (ASCB) specimens.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dependence of K Ic = ffiffiffi ffi l c p on foam density, according to the SENB test results and the average cell sizes presented in [28], is plotted in Fig. 8 together with an approximation by a power-law relation based on Eq.…”
Section: Hole Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a rough estimate of toughness of the neat foams, we resorted to the PUR foam test results reported in [28]. The foam density range considered in [28] covered the densities of interest, and the foams were almost isotropic, therefore, we employed the scaling relation [29] for the interpolation of toughness. According to [29], the mode I fracture toughness depends on foam density q as …”
Section: Hole Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%