2002
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.10321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refinement of the genomic structure of STX1A and mutation analysis in nondeletion Williams syndrome patients

Abstract: Williams syndrome (WS) is a contiguous gene deletion disorder in which the commonly deleted region contains at least 17 genes. One of these genes, Syntaxin 1A (STX1A), codes for a protein that is highly expressed in the nervous system and is essential for the docking of synaptic vesicles with the presynaptic plasma membrane. In this study, we refine the complete genomic structure of the human STX1A gene by direct sequencing and primer walking of bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones and show that STX1A … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of STX1A mutations in five patients, who have WBS but no detectable microdeletion at 7q11.23, supports this idea. 23 Nevertheless, we cannot completely exclude that the partial telomeric deletions cause a position effect on the neighbouring chromosome region and may mimic haploinsufficiency for the complete set of genes in the 1.5 Mb WBSCR. The idea of a position effect is discussed in the recent publication of a spontaneously occurring familial translocation with disruption of the ELN gene in intron 5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lack of STX1A mutations in five patients, who have WBS but no detectable microdeletion at 7q11.23, supports this idea. 23 Nevertheless, we cannot completely exclude that the partial telomeric deletions cause a position effect on the neighbouring chromosome region and may mimic haploinsufficiency for the complete set of genes in the 1.5 Mb WBSCR. The idea of a position effect is discussed in the recent publication of a spontaneously occurring familial translocation with disruption of the ELN gene in intron 5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…23 including the elastin locus (ELN). 1 2 The classical WBS phenotype comprises elastin arteriopathy (supravalvular aortic stenosis and/or peripheral pulmonary stenosis), connective tissue abnormalities (for example, abnormal joint mobility, hernia and diverticula, hoarse voice), and a particular facial appearance (supraorbital fullness, stellate pattern of the iris, short nose with long philtrum, full lips, and wide mouth).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chromosome 7q21.1-q21.3 (Blouin et al 1998) and 7q21.3-q22 (Faraone et al 1998) regions have been linked to schizophrenia but are quite far from the STX1A gene; however, there is evidence that STX1A may affect behavior in disorders such as Williams syndrome (WS). WS is a neurodevelopmental, chromosomal-deletion disorder that may involve the STX1A gene region (Botta et al 1999b;Nakayama et al 1998), although recent evidence suggests that the STX1A gene is not always deleted (Botta et al 1999a;Tassabehji et al 1999;Wu et al 2002). Clinical features of the syndrome include: dysmorphic facies, mental retardation or learning difficulties, elastin arteriopathy, a unique cognitive profile of relative strength in auditory rote memory and language and extreme weakness in visuospatial constructive cognition, and a typical personality that includes overfriendliness, anxiety, and attention problems (Morris and Mervis 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference lists of journal studies were used to find further relevant journal articles. After obtaining journal permissions, photos of individuals with WBS were used to supplement study participants described below (Delgado et al, 2013; Honjo et al, 2015; Jiang & Liu, 2015; Lumaka et al, 2016; Mazumdar, Sarkar, Badveli, & Majumder, 2016; Morris, 1993, 2010; Patil, Madhusudhan, Shah, & Suresh, 2012; Sakhuja, Whyte, Kamath, Martin, & Chitayat, 2015; Smoot, Zhang, Klaiman, Schultz, & Pober, 2005; Tekendo-Ngongang et al, 2014; van Kogelenberg et al, 2010; Wu et al, 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%