2010
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-11-254441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refinement of cytogenetic classification in acute myeloid leukemia: determination of prognostic significance of rare recurring chromosomal abnormalities among 5876 younger adult patients treated in the United Kingdom Medical Research Council trials

Abstract: Diagnostic karyotype provides the framework for risk-stratification schemes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, the prognostic significance of many rare recurring cytogenetic abnormalities remains uncertain. We studied the outcomes of 5876 patients (16-59 years of age) who were classified into 54 cytogenetic subgroups and treated in the Medical Research Council trials. In multivariable analysis, t(15;17)(q22;q21), t(8;21)(q22;q22), and inv(16)(p13q22)/t(16;16)(p13;q22) were the only abnormalities found t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

41
1,384
13
23

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,702 publications
(1,499 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
41
1,384
13
23
Order By: Relevance
“…There was wide variation in the white blood cell (WBC) count and percentage of blasts at initial diagnosis. The risk stratification based on cytogenetic features 18 was shown. The majority of patients carry intermediate (40%) or high risk (56.7%), only 1 patient (3.3%) was categorized with favorable risk.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was wide variation in the white blood cell (WBC) count and percentage of blasts at initial diagnosis. The risk stratification based on cytogenetic features 18 was shown. The majority of patients carry intermediate (40%) or high risk (56.7%), only 1 patient (3.3%) was categorized with favorable risk.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, primary treatment resistance seems to be the major reason for the poor outcome of secondary AML. As secondary AML is associated to known poor prognosis [2,7,8,11,23], multivariable models are essential. A recent population-based Danish study on secondary AML failed to show that secondary AML was an independent risk factor [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data reported to the Swedish Acute Leukemia Registry include (among other data) date of diagnosis, age, gender, FAB type, cytogenetics [10], diagnostic procedures, performance status (PS), presence of antecedent hematological or other malignant disorder, type of treatment (i.e., chemotherapy or radiation) for the preceding disease, type of treatment for AML (intensive or palliative), CR date, and information on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Cytogenetic risk was defined according to the MRC criteria [11]. Dates of death were obtained from the Swedish Population Registry between March and June 2012, and the median follow-up of surviving patients was 9.6 years.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The myelodysplastic syndrome and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia karyotypes were stratified by the Comprehensive Cytogenetic Scoring System of the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System 6,25 and the acute myeloid leukemia karyotypes were stratified by the United Kingdom Medical Research Council system. 26 For analyses in which therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome and therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia were considered together, high-risk karyotype was defined for therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome/chronic myelomonocytic leukemia as Revised International Prognostic Scoring System high or very high risk and for therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia as United Kingdom Medical Research Council adverse risk. Therapies administered were recorded as supportive care (transfusion p53 Expression in therapy-related myeloid neoplasms AHG Cleven et al support and anti-infectives), low-intensity therapies (low-dose cytotoxic therapies, including hypomethylating agents), induction chemotherapy, or allogeneic stem-cell transplantation.…”
Section: Patient Population and Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%