2016
DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/25/5/054001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refined shear correction factor for very thick simply supported and uniformly loaded isosceles right triangular auxetic plates

Abstract: For moderately thick plates, the use of First order Shear Deformation Theory (FSDT) with a constant shear correction factor of 5/6 is sufficient to take into account the plate deflection arising from transverse shear deformation. For very thick plates, the use of Third order Shear Deformation Theory (TSDT) is preferred as it allows the shear strain distribution to be varied through the plate thickness. Therefore no correction factor is required in TSDT, unlike FSDT. Due to the complexity involved in TSDT, this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[50] Following up from analyses on thin auxetic plates [51][52][53] as well as thick auxetic plates based on First-order Shear Deformation Theory (FSDT), [54][55][56] recent effort has shifted to understanding the effect of auxeticity on thick plates using Thirdorder Shear Deformation Theory (TSDT). [57][58][59] Insofar as analysis on auxetic plates is concerned, there is a lack in the literature on thick hexagonal plates; this lack is currently addressed in the present paper. Specifically, this paper benchmarks the Mindlin plate theory (FSDT) against the Reddy plate theory (TSDT) to extract a refined shear correction factor for thick hexagonal plates based on Conway's point matching method for thin hexagonal plates (CPT), and thereafter discusses the effect of material auxeticity on the plate deformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[50] Following up from analyses on thin auxetic plates [51][52][53] as well as thick auxetic plates based on First-order Shear Deformation Theory (FSDT), [54][55][56] recent effort has shifted to understanding the effect of auxeticity on thick plates using Thirdorder Shear Deformation Theory (TSDT). [57][58][59] Insofar as analysis on auxetic plates is concerned, there is a lack in the literature on thick hexagonal plates; this lack is currently addressed in the present paper. Specifically, this paper benchmarks the Mindlin plate theory (FSDT) against the Reddy plate theory (TSDT) to extract a refined shear correction factor for thick hexagonal plates based on Conway's point matching method for thin hexagonal plates (CPT), and thereafter discusses the effect of material auxeticity on the plate deformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of shear correction factors for the presently investigated hexagonal plate with other polygonal plates[57][58][59] under uniform load with simply supported edges.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27,28] While the early and subsequent years of auxetic research has been performed on micromechanical modeling to understand the structure-property-processing relationships that give rise to auxetic behavior in bulk solids, there has been an increasing trend toward effort to comprehend the effect of auxeticity on membranes, [29][30][31] rods, [32][33][34] beams, [35][36][37] shells, [38][39][40] and plates. [41][42][43][44] In the case of plates, the effect of material auxeticity has been investigated on problems of the following mechanical nature: a) static, [45][46][47][48] b) dynamic, [49][50][51][52][53][54] c) thermoelasticity and/or thermal stresses, [55][56][57][58][59] d) instability, [59][60][61][62] e) first-order and higher-order shear deformation, [62][63][64][65][66][67] as well as f) plates of unconventional shapes. [66][67]...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[41][42][43][44] In the case of plates, the effect of material auxeticity has been investigated on problems of the following mechanical nature: a) static, [45][46][47][48] b) dynamic, [49][50][51][52][53][54] c) thermoelasticity and/or thermal stresses, [55][56][57][58][59] d) instability, [59][60][61][62] e) first-order and higher-order shear deformation, [62][63][64][65][66][67] as well as f) plates of unconventional shapes. [66][67][68][69][70][71] To date no investigation has been made on the performance of auxetic materials in the form of sectorial plates. Sectorial plates have traditionally been used for engineering applications such as double acting fluid motors [72] and rotary port for the aircraft, [73] and are continued to be investigated and/or applied in aerospace, nuclear and other engineering applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 summarizes the improved shear correction factors of very thick plates evaluated at the plate centroid for three different Poisson's ratio within isotropic solids: extremely auxetic (v = − 1), typical solids (v = 0.3), and incompressible solids (v = 0.5). The plates considered for comparison are simply supported isosceles right triangular plate (Lim, 2016a), equilateral triangular plate (Lim, 2016b), square plate, and rectangular plate of aspect ratio 4 under uniform load and possess the dimensionless plate thickness of h/a = 0.2. a b Fig. 2 Shear correction factor versus Poisson's ratio of a simply supported rectangular plate under uniform load with a variation in relative thickness for a square plate and b variation in aspect ratio for a thick plate The descriptions of shear correction factors developed herein apply only for rectangular plates of simply supported boundary condition, and are therefore not applicable for thick rectangular plates of clamped and/or free edges.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Casesmentioning
confidence: 99%