2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2019.106328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refined 3600 years palaeointensity curve for Mexico

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our curve does not show any evidence for the "geomagnetic spike" seen in 893±135 BCE in two sedimentary sequences of Hall's cave in Texas, only 1,200 km away from Mexico City (Bourne et al, 2016) (Figure 5b). Unlike palaeointensities higher than 100 μT, two data (CHAL102, this study; EB-229, Mahgoub et al, 2019b) possibly point out an intensity low around 15-20 μT at the same period. These low values will have to be confirmed but already shows that the intensity of the geomagnetic field varied at the regional scale over a larger range than previously thought.…”
Section: 1029/2019gc008668mentioning
confidence: 47%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our curve does not show any evidence for the "geomagnetic spike" seen in 893±135 BCE in two sedimentary sequences of Hall's cave in Texas, only 1,200 km away from Mexico City (Bourne et al, 2016) (Figure 5b). Unlike palaeointensities higher than 100 μT, two data (CHAL102, this study; EB-229, Mahgoub et al, 2019b) possibly point out an intensity low around 15-20 μT at the same period. These low values will have to be confirmed but already shows that the intensity of the geomagnetic field varied at the regional scale over a larger range than previously thought.…”
Section: 1029/2019gc008668mentioning
confidence: 47%
“…Intensities of Rodriguez‐Ceja et al (, ) calculated on a secondary or two overlapping components of magnetization were not considered. Since the publication of Hervé, Chauvin, et al (), the short high‐quality dataset was updated with four new data from Mahgoub et al () and seven from Mahgoub et al (). Concerning our new Chalcatzingo data, 21/23 respect these criteria; the two sherds (CHAL019 and CHAL132) are discarded because only two successful archaeointensities were obtained by sherd…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations