2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Referral Patterns and Cascade Screening for Familial Hypercholesterolemia in a Pediatric Lipid Clinic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study complements previous studies assessing the implementation of universal pediatric lipid screening (Dixon et al ) and the extent of cascade screening for FH (Stempel et al ) by providing the first data on factors influencing family notification of FH risk within a pediatric population in the USA. Our data also show that notification at least out to second‐degree relatives occurred in most families.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study complements previous studies assessing the implementation of universal pediatric lipid screening (Dixon et al ) and the extent of cascade screening for FH (Stempel et al ) by providing the first data on factors influencing family notification of FH risk within a pediatric population in the USA. Our data also show that notification at least out to second‐degree relatives occurred in most families.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Yet, no nationwide population or cascade screening program currently exists, and the diagnosis rate for FH in the US is estimated to be < 1% of expected cases (Gonzalez Santos and Underberg 2011;Nordestgaard et al 2013). Even when a pediatric FH case is identified, one study in a US pediatric clinic reported an average of only 1.5 relatives diagnosed per index case (Stempel et al 2016); in the Netherlands, that average was 8 (Defesche 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2018 Multi-Society guidelines for cholesterol management assigned universal pediatric cholesterol screening a 2B recommendation, implying the intervention “may be reasonable” and “effectiveness is unclear” [ 15 ]. Universal pediatric cholesterol screening has been shown to increase detection of HeFH [ 16 ] but these guidelines are not well-recognized by physicians [ 17 , 18 , 19 ], which may lead to under-recognition of HeFH in children and young adults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29][30][31][32] Three of the studies also report on follow-up outcome of subjects with both primary and secondary dyslipidemias. [29][30][31] Stempel et al 32 reported that significantly more children with familial hypercholesterolemia were referred to their primary dyslipidemia clinic after the guideline release (n = 14 from February 2011 to December 2011 vs n = 28 from January 2013 to December 2014). Additionally, the sample size of our study is larger than the aforementioned pediatric lipid clinic studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%