2001
DOI: 10.1136/thorax.56.9.691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference values of interrupter respiratory resistance in healthy preschool white children

Abstract: Background-Interrupter respiratory resistance (Rint) is reported to be useful in evaluating lung function in poorly collaborating patients. However, no reference values are available from large samples of preschool children using the standard interrupter method. The aim of this study was to define reference Rint values in a population of healthy preschool children. Methods-Rint was assessed without supporting the cheeks in children with no history of wheeze from six kindergartens. To evaluate the eVects of upp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
72
2
8

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(16 reference statements)
6
72
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…A few studies have reported reference equations for the interrupter technique in young school children [6,7,11,12], but for older children these are lacking. Because of the possible applications of this technique in a larger age range (epidemiological and clinical research, children unable to participate in active lung function measurements), normal values for Rint,e were obtained in 208 healthy Caucasian children aged between 3-13 yrs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A few studies have reported reference equations for the interrupter technique in young school children [6,7,11,12], but for older children these are lacking. Because of the possible applications of this technique in a larger age range (epidemiological and clinical research, children unable to participate in active lung function measurements), normal values for Rint,e were obtained in 208 healthy Caucasian children aged between 3-13 yrs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, passive measurements of airway function may also be required for clinical research in older children or in older children who are unable to perform forced expiratory manoeuvres because of developmental disorders or neuromuscular disease. Reference data are available for young children [6,7,11,12] and adults [13], but not for children of w7 yrs of age. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to expand the previous data set to better describe relationships between expiratory resistance and body size.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6][7] Además, la mayoría de las publicaciones incluyeron a niños menores de 7 años. El gran número de niños incorporados en este estudio (460), tanto sanos como enfermos, unido a la amplitud del rango de edad (2 a 18 años) hace que las observaciones obtenidas sean …”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…El porcentaje global de mediciones aceptables fue del 82,6% (72,6% en < 7 años y 91,7% en > 7 años), intermedio entre los porcentajes publicados (64% a 95%). 4,5,25,26 El porcentaje de medidas aceptables en menores de 4 años obtenido es sensiblemente inferior al publicado por otros autores. 4,25 Una explicación es que estos autores no detallan las condiciones de aceptación empleadas para las mediciones.…”
Section: % Fev1unclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation