2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.07.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference values for paediatric pulmonary function testing: The Utrecht dataset

Abstract: These new paediatric reference equations provide accurate estimates of the range of normality for most commonly used pulmonary function indices, resulting in less underdiagnosis and overdiagnosis of pulmonary diseases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
93
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
9
93
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, participants in the school children age group showed a significantly higher success rate in manovacuometry and spirometry tests, compared to the preschool children group. Such findings support previous studies showing a greater ease in the performance of pulmonary function tests in school age, since the higher the age of the individual the greater its ability for interpretation, concentration, and motor skills for the performance of the tests 5,6,9 . Thus, these methods for pulmonary assessment can be characterized as simple tests, of easy understanding and clinical applicability, enabling the measurement of respiratory capacity, volumes, and flows, as well as respiratory muscle strength in young age group 1,25,26 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, participants in the school children age group showed a significantly higher success rate in manovacuometry and spirometry tests, compared to the preschool children group. Such findings support previous studies showing a greater ease in the performance of pulmonary function tests in school age, since the higher the age of the individual the greater its ability for interpretation, concentration, and motor skills for the performance of the tests 5,6,9 . Thus, these methods for pulmonary assessment can be characterized as simple tests, of easy understanding and clinical applicability, enabling the measurement of respiratory capacity, volumes, and flows, as well as respiratory muscle strength in young age group 1,25,26 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These methods are important tools not only as clinical parameters at the time of evaluation, but also as objective instruments for the long-term monitoring of lung growth from childhood to adulthood 4,5 . In clinical practice, they are commonly used in subjects with a predisposition to the development of respiratory disorders, neuromuscular disorders, and in patients with lung diseases, such as asthma and cystic fibrosis 3,6 . Among the pulmonary function tests, spirometry is characterized as one of the most widely used methods of pulmonary assessment in clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tests would be considered valid when at least 3 acceptable and reproducible maneuvers were obtained, with a variation of Ͻ5%. Data were expressed in absolute values and in percentage of the predicted, using the equations of Koopman et al 22 Lung function was performed using a flux-based spirometer (KoKo, Louisville, Colorado). Spirometric parameters evaluated included FEV 1 , FVC, and forced expiratory flow between 25 and 75% of vital capacity.…”
Section: What This Paper Contributes To Our Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Stanojevic et al 24 reference equations were used for spirometric parameters. Koopman et al 25 reference equations were used for D LCO and D LCO /V A and extrapolated to ages above 18 years to avoid an artificial variance between age groups arisen from differences between reference materials. All reference equations for pulmonary function parameters were gender, age and height specific.…”
Section: Examinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%