2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/982374
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference Values for Maximal Inspiratory Pressure: A Systematic Review

Abstract: The present meta-analysis provides normative MIP values that are reflective of a large sample (n=840) and likely represents the broadest representation of participant characteristics compared with previous reports of normative data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
59
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
59
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known, for example, that subjects with chronic lower back pain and sacroiliac joint pain have abnormal diaphragm movement [19,20]. However, it seems very likely that the relationship between height and diaphragm excursion in QB reflects the one between height and tidal volume (volume-related rib cage biomechanic properties and optimized muscle fiber's length-tension ratio), while gender affects the DP excursion due to greater maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures produced by males (more abundant inspiratory muscle mass and physiologically higher maximal inspiratory pressures) [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known, for example, that subjects with chronic lower back pain and sacroiliac joint pain have abnormal diaphragm movement [19,20]. However, it seems very likely that the relationship between height and diaphragm excursion in QB reflects the one between height and tidal volume (volume-related rib cage biomechanic properties and optimized muscle fiber's length-tension ratio), while gender affects the DP excursion due to greater maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures produced by males (more abundant inspiratory muscle mass and physiologically higher maximal inspiratory pressures) [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of the existence of several benchmarks for MIP measures was confirmed in a recently published systematic review28, in which the low methodological quality of the existing articles was noted, contributing to an appreciation of the difficulty, in research and especially in clinical situations, of choosing an appropriate prediction equation. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently peak inspiratory flow (PIF) measurement has been of interest as a reliable and accessible tool for assessment of respiratory muscle strength in older adults (14). Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) is the most commonly used measure for assessment of inspiratory muscle function (15). Subjective factors which may influence MIP include proper test performance, weight, age, sex, height, fitness level and smoking status (15, 16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) is the most commonly used measure for assessment of inspiratory muscle function (15). Subjective factors which may influence MIP include proper test performance, weight, age, sex, height, fitness level and smoking status (15, 16). There is no agreement regarding which of these variables have a significant influence on MIP (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation