2016
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-908x.2015.00392.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference Values Following ISO Guidelines for Frequently Requested Rock Reference Materials

Abstract: We present new reference values for nineteen USGS, GSJ and GIT-IWG rock reference materials that belong to the most accessed samples of the GeoReM database. The determination of the reference values and their uncertainties at the 95% confidence level follows as closely as possible ISO guidelines and the Certification Protocol of the International Association of Geoanalysts. We used analytical data obtained by the state-of-the-art techniques published mainly in the last 20 years and available in GeoReM. The dat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

29
248
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 403 publications
(293 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
29
248
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Major elements (oxides; from SiO 2 to FeO) are in %m/m and all trace elements (from Cl to W) are in µg/g. Groups of analytical methods according to Velasco-Tapia et al (2001), briefly stated: Gr1 -classical methods; Gr2 -atomic absorption methods; Gr3 -X-ray fluorescence methods; Gr4 -emission spectrometry methods; Gr5 -nuclear methods; Gr6 -mass spectrometry methods; Gr7 -chromatography methods; Gr8 -miscellaneous methods; n out -number of observations after statistical processing; -x-mean; U 99 -total uncertainty of the mean ( -x ) at 99% confidence level; * -recommended value; *1 -recommended value 1 (first recommended value); *2 -recommended value 2 (second recommended value); see the text for %RU 99 and %U diff ; the 99% uncertainty value was calculated in the present work from the reported standard deviation by the original authors (Gladney and Roelandts, 1988;Velasco-Tapia et al, 2001) or from the 95% uncertainty values reported by Jochum et al (2016); the rounding of the data for this table was achieved from the application of the flexible rules put forth by Verma (2005Verma ( , 2016. Figure 6.…”
Section: Comparison With Earlier Compilations and Evaluation Of New Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Major elements (oxides; from SiO 2 to FeO) are in %m/m and all trace elements (from Cl to W) are in µg/g. Groups of analytical methods according to Velasco-Tapia et al (2001), briefly stated: Gr1 -classical methods; Gr2 -atomic absorption methods; Gr3 -X-ray fluorescence methods; Gr4 -emission spectrometry methods; Gr5 -nuclear methods; Gr6 -mass spectrometry methods; Gr7 -chromatography methods; Gr8 -miscellaneous methods; n out -number of observations after statistical processing; -x-mean; U 99 -total uncertainty of the mean ( -x ) at 99% confidence level; * -recommended value; *1 -recommended value 1 (first recommended value); *2 -recommended value 2 (second recommended value); see the text for %RU 99 and %U diff ; the 99% uncertainty value was calculated in the present work from the reported standard deviation by the original authors (Gladney and Roelandts, 1988;Velasco-Tapia et al, 2001) or from the 95% uncertainty values reported by Jochum et al (2016); the rounding of the data for this table was achieved from the application of the flexible rules put forth by Verma (2005Verma ( , 2016. Figure 6.…”
Section: Comparison With Earlier Compilations and Evaluation Of New Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once again, even for the most recent compilation of Jochum et al (2016), this parameter (%U diff ) varied from about 50% for Ho to about 680% for Gd (Table 3). The statistical information for the REEs obtained from the present methodology (Table 3) is therefore recommended for future applications of quality control.…”
Section: Comparison With Earlier Compilations and Evaluation Of New Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Reproducibility is better than 2 % for REEs and better than 3 % for the rest of the trace elements except for Ta (6.5 %) and Be (3.6 %). Mean percent error is generally within 5-10 % relative to the preferred values of Jochum et al (2016) and Dulski (2001). 5 Major element compositions of constituent mineral phases were determined with a JEOL-8800R electron microprobe at Kanazawa University using 3 m probe diameter, 20 nA probe current and 20 kV accelerating voltage.…”
Section: Sampling and Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%