2005
DOI: 10.1002/pd.1091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference ranges for umbilical vein blood flow in the second half of pregnancy based on longitudinal data

Abstract: New reference ranges for UV blood flow based on longitudinal observations appear slightly different from cross-sectional studies, and should be more appropriate for serial evaluation of fetal circulation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
90
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
11
90
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An increasing umbilical venous blood flow throughout gestation was found previously (13)(14)(15)(16)30,31). We found a similar development (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An increasing umbilical venous blood flow throughout gestation was found previously (13)(14)(15)(16)30,31). We found a similar development (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…However, three recent publications showed excellent agreement between both methods for flow calculation in the UV (14,22) and the PV (18), which is reassuring for the method applied in this study. The data presented in this study confirm the flow estimates of some recent studies (14,15,22,31), but somehow lower than others (13,16,30,33) possibly because of sampling site, insonation technique, and diameter measurements as discussed previously (14). Our results are partly different to those of Bellotti et al (16) also in regard to the flow distribution between the left and right liver lobes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Barbera et al [34] found that reduced umbilical venous flow was due to reduced velocity and not to a reduced diameter of the umbilical vein. Latest investigations therefore focus again on volume fiow in the umbilical vein [20,35,36].…”
Section: Umbilical Vein (Uv)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mass was located near the cord insertion site (3.5 cm). Morphologic fetal examination revealed no structural malformations, but did show signs suggesting hemodynamic overload, such as cardiomegaly (cardiothoracic area ratio 41%) [6] together with an umbilical vein diameter 1 97.5 percentile (6.1 mm) [7] . Doppler study did not show tricuspid insuffi ciency, the pulsatility index in the ductus venosus was in the normal range (0.7) [8] and the peak systolic velocity in the MCA was 0.40 m/s, also within normal limits for gestational age [5] .…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%