1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-987x(199808)19:11<1284::aid-jcc8>3.0.co;2-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference program for molecular calculations with Slater-type orbitals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The former is simply based on a leastsquares fit of a linear combination of Gaussian orbitals in order to mimic the shape of STOs. This idea, proposed first by Boys and Shavitt [25], was the dominant method used in the early versions of the SMILES program [26]. The Gauss transform methods are more involved and use some integral representations in order to transform STO into a more computationally convenient form.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former is simply based on a leastsquares fit of a linear combination of Gaussian orbitals in order to mimic the shape of STOs. This idea, proposed first by Boys and Shavitt [25], was the dominant method used in the early versions of the SMILES program [26]. The Gauss transform methods are more involved and use some integral representations in order to transform STO into a more computationally convenient form.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intense research on molecular integrals with Slater functions (STO) carried out in the 1990s has produced several computational codes that have not been superseded yet,1–5 despite the fact that these efforts have been continued and even increased in the last years 6…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these codes, developed by us2 (the SMILES program), was designed for exploring the performance of these functions in general applications. Its current version admits STO of s , p , d , f , g , and h types, works with up to 400 basis functions at an affordable cost, and stores the integrals in a standard way so that it can be easily interfaced with almost any program for the energy optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that the conventional DFT methods perform rather poorly on the prediction of MA ,, because the popular DFAs suffer severely from the static correlation error. ,,, We thus adopt a hybrid approach to evaluate the MA of the composite junction during the tip control process. We first use the complete active space self-consistent field (CASSCF) method implemented in the ORCA program to compute the MA of an isolated FeOEP molecule. Because the spin-unpair electrons locate mostly on the Fe center, the CASSCF calculation should well capture the multireference nature of the MA, , provided that the Fe d-orbitals are all included within the active space.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%