2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2019.110274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference numerical database for turbulent flow and heat transfer in liquid metals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impinging jet configuration is characterized by the dimensionless jet-tosurface spacing, also called Aspect Ratio = AR H B / which is here set to = AR 2 as in Hattori and Nagano (2004), and by the Reynolds number = Re UB ν , with U the mean jet velocity and ν, the kinematic viscosity. Three cases were investigated using DNS (Shams et al, 2019b): a laminar, uniform velocity inlet at = Re 4000 (L4000), a fully developed turbulent inlet at Re = 4000 (T4000) and at Re = 5700 (T5700). The turbulent inlet profiles were obtained from an auxiliary channel flow simulation running simultaneously with the main jet simulation.…”
Section: Forced Convection Impinging Jet Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The impinging jet configuration is characterized by the dimensionless jet-tosurface spacing, also called Aspect Ratio = AR H B / which is here set to = AR 2 as in Hattori and Nagano (2004), and by the Reynolds number = Re UB ν , with U the mean jet velocity and ν, the kinematic viscosity. Three cases were investigated using DNS (Shams et al, 2019b): a laminar, uniform velocity inlet at = Re 4000 (L4000), a fully developed turbulent inlet at Re = 4000 (T4000) and at Re = 5700 (T5700). The turbulent inlet profiles were obtained from an auxiliary channel flow simulation running simultaneously with the main jet simulation.…”
Section: Forced Convection Impinging Jet Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21. Comparison of the δ 75 velocity thickness (black) and of the δ T,75 temperature thicknesses at = Pr 1 (blue), 0.1 (green) and 0.01 (red):= Re 700 (Left) and = Re 4000 (Right) simulations (Shams et al, 2019b)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, for lower Pr number fluids (e.g. liquid metals) the available validation data are still scarce and unreliable, especially in the natural convection regime and therefore new experiments are needed for the development of numerical models [4,5,6]. Measurement of THF is challenging as it requires simultaneous measurement of velocity and temperature fluctuations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%