2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference map for liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S1). They illustrate that a two-tiered workflow consisting of (a) an "accurate mass and time tag" approach for initial global profiling (20,38,(51)(52)(53) in combination with (b) targeted LFQ of particular proteins of interest based on scheduled precursor lists and alternating MS and MS/MS acquisition (39) improves label-free quantitation accuracy. Although the additional targeted LFQ step is time-consuming when applied to a large number of proteins it offers similar advantages as other targeted approaches such as selected reaction monitoring (SRM) (54).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S1). They illustrate that a two-tiered workflow consisting of (a) an "accurate mass and time tag" approach for initial global profiling (20,38,(51)(52)(53) in combination with (b) targeted LFQ of particular proteins of interest based on scheduled precursor lists and alternating MS and MS/MS acquisition (39) improves label-free quantitation accuracy. Although the additional targeted LFQ step is time-consuming when applied to a large number of proteins it offers similar advantages as other targeted approaches such as selected reaction monitoring (SRM) (54).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Global Quantitative Profiling-Global quantitative profiling was performed using ProfileAnalysis 2.0 and Proteinscape 3.1 (Bruker Daltonics) according to the "accurate mass and time tag" approach (38). Quantitative global profiling ratios (salinity stress versus handling controls) for identified proteins have been deposited along with the corresponding protein identification and mass spectrometry data in the PRIDE repository (29) and are available under PRIDE accession numbers 28622-28631.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, many investigators now feel that the proteome may contain the most highly informative biomarkers for the detection of aggressive prostate cancer and patient-tailored therapy once the disease is detected. The current landscape of high-throughput proteomic technologies is constantly advancing (30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38) and now offers the possibility to evaluate, in a single experimental step, the abundance, expression, and activation state of hundreds of proteins in tissues and biological fluids, allowing a complete overview of the complex events that underpin tumor development and progression. Such information will help in better molecular characterization of the tumor and in the identification of more specific tumor biomarkers that could be directly transferred to clinical practices once extensive validation has been performed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a new label-free quantitative technique based on liquid chromatography coupling with tandem mass spectrometry was proposed, and has been recommended by more and more researchers (8,13,15). The label-free quantitative technique can also be divided into two classes: a technique based on MS information and based on MS/MS information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%