Reference layer artefact subtraction (RLAS): A novel method of minimizing EEG artefacts during simultaneous fMRI

Abstract

Large artefacts compromise EEG data quality during simultaneous fMRI. These artefact voltages pose heavy demands on the bandwidth and dynamic range of EEG amplifiers and mean that even small fractional variations in the artefact voltages give rise to significant residual artefacts after average artefact subtraction. Any intrinsic reduction in the magnitude of the artefacts would be highly advantageous, allowing data with a higher bandwidth to be acquired without amplifier saturation, as well as reducing the residual artefacts that can easily swamp signals from brain activity measured using current methods. Since these problems currently limit the utility of simultaneous EEG-fMRI, new approaches for reducing the magnitude and variability of the artefacts are required. One such approach is the use of an EEG cap that incorporates electrodes embedded in a reference layer that has similar conductivity to tissue and is electrically isolated from the scalp. With this arrangement, the artefact voltages produced on the reference layer leads by time-varying field gradients, cardiac pulsation and subject movement are similar to those induced in the scalp leads, but neuronal signals are not detected in the reference layer. Taking the difference of the voltages in the reference and scalp channels will therefore reduce the artefacts, without affecting sensitivity to neuronal signals. Here, we test this approach by using a simple experimental realisation of the reference layer to investigate the artefacts induced on the leads attached to the reference layer and scalp and to evaluate the degree of artefact attenuation that can be achieved via reference layer artefact subtraction (RLAS). Through a series of experiments on phantoms and human subjects, we show that RLAS significantly reduces the gradient (GA), pulse (PA) and motion (MA) artefacts, while allowing accurate recording of neuronal signals. The results indicate that RLAS generally outperforms AAS when motion is present in the removal of the GA and PA, while the combination of AAS and RLAS always produces higher artefact attenuation than AAS. Additionally, we demonstrate that RLAS greatly attenuates the unpredictable and highly variable MAs that are very hard to remove using post-processing methods.

Pulse Artifact Detection in Simultaneous EEG–fMRI Recording Based on EEG Map Topography

“…The method is based on the topographic organization of the pulse artifact, consisting in an (Chowdhury et al 2014). Our technique can replace ECG, especially when it is of poor quality, due to poor electrode adherence or motion.…”

Spurious correlations in simultaneous EEG-fMRI driven by in-scanner movement

“…An interesting solution to control for motion on EEG-fMRI data is to record motion co-registered to EEG recordings with a sufficiently high sampling rate. Recently, several motion-recording approaches have been proposed (Abbott et al, 2014;Chowdhury et al, 2014;Jorge et al, 2015;LeVan et al, 2013;van der Meer et al, 2015).…”

Dual array EEG-fMRI: An approach for motion artifact suppression in EEG recorded simultaneously with fMRI

“…daEEG on the other hand suppresses both BCG and non-BCG artifacts. Other solutions for removing non-BCG artifact have been developed (Bonmassar et al, 2002;Chowdhury et al, 2014;Jorge et al, 2015;LeVan et al, 2013;Masterton et al, 2007). Common to these approaches is the use of reference motion sensors, which do not record brain signals.…”

“…Masterton et al (2007) demonstrated suppression of both BCG and non-BCG interference by implementing three wire loops fixed to the EEG cap and connected to the bipolar amplifier as a motion sensor independent from EEG. Luo et al (2014) and Chowdhury et al (2014) reported an artifact suppression approach which is based on the reference layer of electrodes embedded into the conductive material. These techniques however require additional MR-compatible equipment.…”