2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reference intervals for thromboelastometry with the ROTEM® delta in cats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Parameter wise, we identified considerably higher variability and lower correlation for CT, CFT and ML compared to alpha angle, MCF, MCE and G. This is consistent with the findings of previous studies [ 7 , 29 ] but in contrast to other studies that report low variability <15% or good correlation in dogs [ 8 ] and cats [ 11 , 32 ]. The early phase of clot initiation reflected by CT is known to be mainly dependent on the activator and most sensitive to small differences regarding sample handling and choice of activator, which would explain the higher intrarater variability of CT and CFT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Parameter wise, we identified considerably higher variability and lower correlation for CT, CFT and ML compared to alpha angle, MCF, MCE and G. This is consistent with the findings of previous studies [ 7 , 29 ] but in contrast to other studies that report low variability <15% or good correlation in dogs [ 8 ] and cats [ 11 , 32 ]. The early phase of clot initiation reflected by CT is known to be mainly dependent on the activator and most sensitive to small differences regarding sample handling and choice of activator, which would explain the higher intrarater variability of CT and CFT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In veterinary medicine, TEG/ROTEM have been validated for use in horses [ 6 , 7 ], dogs [ 8 , 9 ] and cats [ 10 , 11 ]. Although, theoretically, there are many advantages of viscoelastic tests compared to traditional coagulation testing in plasma, it is important to note that multiple preanalytical and analytical factors can influence test results [ 4 , 12 , 13 ], including sample collection technique (size of chosen vessel, amount of vessel occlusion, venipuncture technique, use of vacutainers, use of syringes), sample handling (storage time before initiation of the test, storage temperature), and the analysis itself (variability of ROTEM devices, operator variability).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, reference intervals established in the present assay were based on a smaller population, and the robust method was used instead of a percentile method. Intra-assay coefficients of variation, evaluated from quadruplicate measurements, were found to be below 10 % for CT, CFT, alpha, and MCF in a previous study [ 26 ]. In another study, intra-assay CV was below 5 % in kaolin-activated thromboelastography in 30 healthy cats [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Recently, feline reference intervals for ROTEM using ex-tem and in-tem assays, based on 55 clinically healthy European shorthair cats, were published [ 26 ]. Reference ranges established in the present study were similar although a narrower interval was found for some of the parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation